13-02-2015, 08:05 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Cliff Varnell Wrote:The key here is the phrase "extensive case."
No one outside JFK head wound/s obsessives is going to sit still for an "extensive case."
The brain evidence can be covered in very short order.
I don't consider myself a head wound "obsessive".
No need to attack other conspiracy evidence in order to defend the shirt forensics.
It's important to distinguish between evidence of the murder, and evidence of the cover-up.
The head wound/s evidence tells us what?
That multiple shooters struck JFK?
Yeah, we already know that.
What else does it tell us?
That the medical record contains many irregularities -- which goes to the cover-up.
It does not tell us how any times JFK was shot, and we can't know for sure if there was pre-autopsy surgery to the head -- which goes to the cover-up.
The night of the autopsy the doctors openly speculated that JFK was struck with a high tech weapon, a round which wouldn't be found in an autopsy.
This was a solid lead in pursuit of the perps.
The FBI men took the speculation seriously, and one of them called the FBI Lab to get the background on such weapons.
The guy at the FBI Lab said forget about it, the Bullet is in from Dallas etc bs etc.
But the fact is that the FBI had been briefed by Charles Senseney, who worked for the US Army Special Operations Division at Ft Detrick, that
such weapons did indeed exist.
The weapons were used by a shadowy entity called the Staff Support Group -- military officers involved in a CIA operation.
Not only is the clothing/T3/throat entrance evidence the most efficient way to dispatch the SBT, far more importantly it is the only evidence which points to specific Persons of Interest.