20-02-2015, 10:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 21-02-2015, 12:51 AM by Albert Doyle.)
Michael Cross Wrote:I'm not sure the two points are exclusive. Lee and Harvey are both there. One of them gets change on the second floor and they have to account for that as well as the other on the stairs, so - later you get the lunch room incident. I don't see it as an either/or.
IMO (opinion) first day statements are more credible, especially with LHO dead and the powers that be free to edit at will in the aftermath.
Plausible. Oswald could have been on the 1st floor and not seen at all by Baker and Truly. Knowing Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald in the lunchroom the first phase plan placed him there as well.
Weren't Fritz's notes saying Oswald told him he was in the lunchroom from the Depository?
It would make sense to ostensibly place one Oswald to be framed on the 6th floor and another to be duped on the 1st or 2nd floor.
The reason I think this theory is at least plausible is because Baker and Truly conspicuously give no details about a man they allowed to walk away uncontested even though he was close to the 6th floor. Baker only said Truly said he worked there.
You've got to remember, the Dallas Police Station was the same place where they took no notes on Oswald's interviews. So anything is possible as far as statements at that point.
My dear Watson, I would place Oswald in the lunchroom because Baker indicated a Coca Cola in his hand and later scratched it out. In other words they removed the Coke once the realized it placed him in the lunchroom for too long. Not only possible evidence of Oswald's presence, but Baker's compliance as well.
.