21-02-2015, 02:44 AM
Somehow I doubt that Officer Baker could have bumped into Oswald on the second floor, then bumped into the "Oswald double" on the fourth floor, and failed to notice anything amiss.
If Baker was "in" on the plot, Oswald would never have left the building alive. If Truly was "in" on the plot, it beggars the imagination to think that he might be foolish enough to lead Baker into encountering both Oswald, and a double, within a few minutes of each other; or indeed that he would deliberately permit Officer Baker to cross the escape path of the shooter.
Neither Baker nor Truly knew, in advance, anything of significance. How and why they "cooperated" afterwards, that's quite a different thing.
If Baker was "in" on the plot, Oswald would never have left the building alive. If Truly was "in" on the plot, it beggars the imagination to think that he might be foolish enough to lead Baker into encountering both Oswald, and a double, within a few minutes of each other; or indeed that he would deliberately permit Officer Baker to cross the escape path of the shooter.
Neither Baker nor Truly knew, in advance, anything of significance. How and why they "cooperated" afterwards, that's quite a different thing.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."