Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Palamara, "Doyle," Fetzer, and Jeffries Dust-Ups: The Simple Reason Why
#1
Why do I feel obligated to engage and, where appropriate, out Vince Palamara, "Albert Doyle," Jim Fetzer, Ralph Cinque, Phillip Nelson, Don Jeffries, and their like?

Because as I write these words, we have nine months left to define and effect justice for John Fitzgerald Kennedy and the extended victims of his assassination.

And these individuals, in my estimation motivated by hubris and/or hostile agendas and, in some instances, burdened by limited intellects, physical or psychological maladies, and/or the absence of the courage of their alleged convictions, skip merrily along without the slightest sense of urgency to quicken their lilting gaits.

We have reached the "take no prisoners" stage of our work. The time for politely dismissing these people has come and gone.

We remain at war with the killers of JFK -- including the witting, unwitting, and half-witting accessories after the fact to his assassination.

I am obliged, by conscience, to engage them on the cyber battlefield. Among my weapons are facts, satire, insult, humor, and good old-fashioned button-pushing.

There surely will be consequences for my actions. I take no pleasure in alienating comrades or treating former friends unkindly. This is not how I wish to spend my days.

So be it.

Those well-meaning friends who believe that we must observe Geneva Convention-like rules of engagement in this struggle simply do not understand the ramifications of such behavior.

The enemy observes no such rules.

How many tender mercies were in evidence in Dealey Plaza that day?

Make no mistake: I do not stand alone. Ours is a small band of brothers and sisters. We have each other's backs.

Melodramatic? Maybe.

Maybe not.
Reply
#2
Tell me, Charles, exactly what malady do I suffer from? I take a back seat to no one in my long held conviction that JFK was assassinated by conspirators that included the most powerful forces in our society. I have spent a very long time doing what I could, which included working as a local chairman of Mark Lane's Citizens Committee of Inquiry as a teenager, contributing a piece to Penn Jones' Continuing Inquiry (and feeding him other stories), delving into the JFK assassination in my 2007 novel The Unreals, covering it extensively in my as yet unpublished Yes, Virginia, There Is A Conspiracy, and writing thousands of words on the subject that are still available online.

I have fought our mutual enemies to the best of my ability, and in the only way an average citizen can. How have you fought them any harder? Jim Fetzer has produced several valuable books on the assassination, and Vince Palamara has done more in depth research on the Secret Service than anyone else. Now he's finally going to get his work published, and you already are trashing it.

You claim to be engaged in "battle." Who are you fighting, Charles? Me? Vince? Fetzer? Albert Doyle? Did we conspire to assassinate JFK? We are all on the same side- we all know the official story is bogus. How are you waging your "war?" By calling others who know there was a conspiracy childish names?

Your ego is too big to admit that you don't possess some special knowledge that is unknowable to the unwashed masses in the research community. Vince's book will help the cause of truth and justice. We should all be celebrating its publication.
Reply
#3
I've got one problem with you, Don.

You want to play by Marquess of Queensbury rules at a knife fight.

Which keeps you from being part of the solution.

If you wish to kick the enemy in the balls, you first must uncross your legs.

[video]http://www.tcm.com/mediaroom/video/221377/Butch-Cassidy-and-the-Sundance-Kid-Movie-Clip-Guns-or-Knives-.html[/video]
Reply
#4
Quote:How are you waging your "war?" By calling others who know there was a conspiracy childish names?


Quote:If even one of your devoted sycophants slips up and, in your mind, uses the wrong word, they feel the full brunt of the Dragonian wrath. You are not a benevolent ruler, and demand total, unadulterated subservience from your followers.

Don,

Do you realize what an insult that quote is to many members of this forum?

sycophants
subservient followers

Charles Drago can stand all by himself.He needs not sycophants.......

But,thanks for the belittlement...
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
Buckminster Fuller
Reply
#5
Keith Millea Wrote:
Quote:How are you waging your "war?" By calling others who know there was a conspiracy childish names?


Quote:If even one of your devoted sycophants slips up and, in your mind, uses the wrong word, they feel the full brunt of the Dragonian wrath. You are not a benevolent ruler, and demand total, unadulterated subservience from your followers.

Don,

Do you realize what an insult that quote is to many members of this forum?

sycophants
subservient followers

Charles Drago can stand all by himself.He needs not sycophants.......

But,thanks for the belittlement...

Thank you, Keith.

But please, do not feel belittled.

Which is to say, do not suffer the judgments of fools.

With the possible exceptions of surveillance agents, I do not have followers.

I am not a ruler -- benevolent or otherwise. Although I am quite capable of taking a person's measure (in the case of Miss Manners, it's rather easy).

I do stand on my own, but no man is an island. I know that many -- but by no means the majority -- of DPF's correspondents share or respect my viewpoints.

Bottom line: I'm not alone in the foxhole.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The REAL reason Oswald went to Irving on 11.21.63 Gil Jesus 1 457 15-06-2023, 03:46 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jeffries' Frazier interview Richard Gilbride 1 1,232 11-10-2021, 08:39 PM
Last Post: Richard Gilbride
  DPF Bans Professor James H. Fetzer: The Rationale The Moderators 69 361,284 04-04-2020, 09:01 AM
Last Post: Mark A. O'Blazney
  Where the heck is Albert Doyle? Richard Gilbride 80 69,129 16-10-2017, 05:36 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Vince Palamara's New Book reviewed by Joe Green Jim DiEugenio 0 2,891 09-07-2017, 11:26 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Vince Palamara reviews Five Presidents by Clint Hill Jim DiEugenio 2 3,442 20-05-2016, 01:47 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  The Decline and Fall of Jim Fetzer Jim DiEugenio 132 66,101 18-03-2016, 06:51 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  A mathematical reason to study the JFK assassination Steve Minnerly 26 7,422 18-08-2013, 07:52 AM
Last Post: David Josephs
  From James Fetzer's Group - for those interested Adele Edisen 5 3,380 08-06-2013, 12:47 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  Fetzer gets a listing in Urban Dictionary: 'Fetzering' is a term for talking balls. Seamus Coogan 83 18,848 26-03-2013, 11:24 PM
Last Post: John Mooney

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)