DRAGO: As you know, in good conscience we have put our recent differences behind us, Vince. And in the spirit of our detente, I'd like to ask you, cordially, publicly and respectfully, to answer the following questions within the next 24 hours:
1. To the best of your knowledge, did Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone and not as part of a conspiracy to assassinate JFK, kill the president?
2. To the best of your knowledge, did Lee Harvey Oswald -- whether or not he acted alone -- aim a firearm at and discharge it with the hope of hitting JFK in Dallas, Texas at approximately 12:30 PM local time on November 22, 1963?
3. To the best of your knowledge, were any Secret Service agents, regardless of rank, complicit in a conspiracy to kill JFK in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963?
I sincerely thank you for your attention to these matters.
Peace,
PALAMARA: Thanks, Charles! To answer your questions above in order: 1. No ; 2. No- Barry Ernest's book has me convinced that, whatever role Oswald played that day, he was on the second floor lunchroom when JFK was killed!; 3. Yes, unfortunately. 1-3 are based on MY book, Ernest's book, Horne's books, and Douglass' book, primarily (but not exclusively). I told ya, Charlie- it is as if my 2007 "brain fart" never happened! Peace, Vince
PALAMARA: You have my permission to post this as my contract to the community
PALAMARA: P.S. I DESERVED your anger (and anyone else's, too) for my 2007 stupidity and for not thinking clearly then about the ramifications to my reputation, my RESEARCH (THAT is pretty important, huh?), and my (prior) conclusions. The "cult of celebrity" and my ego got the best of me. (And you can post that, too)
Credit is due: Vince indeed has proffered a "contract" of sorts to the JFK research community. I hope all of you will join me in extending to Vince the benefit of the doubt and respecting him for publishing his mea culpa.
Charles for posing and Vince for addressing the multipoint query resets the gyros, compass, and gps locator.
Justice is the destination of our cybercade.
From Greer's I BRAKE FOR SNIPERS bumper sticker to Elmer Moore's badgering of Malcolm Perry and depiction of JFK as "a traitor" to its destruction of its files there is ample evidence of treason on the part of rogue agents.
Lee Oswald has had a multiply-sourced alibi for his absence from the alleged "nest" as well as doubly-proved absence of incriminating cheek GSR, FBI "expert" Cunningham's fantasy of the Mannlicher Carcano's "tight mechanism" to the contrary not withstanding.
Vincent Bugliosi has affixed a certificate of his evil complicity to the cathedral of public opinion with a thousand and a half pneumatic nails.
Jim DiEugenio removed that despicable vandalism in a ten-part Retrieving History from Bugliosi's BP Oil Spill.
This chapter is now rectified thanks to the courage and clarity of Charles, Vince, and Jim.
On to Justice (though the icons fall. . .to fiery karma)
We are all human, with strengths and fallibilities.
I have not had the privilege of meeting or speaking with Vince Palamara.
So, the following is presumptuous.
But I will presume.
I am aware of the challenges, the doubts, the occasional loneliness and horror of original investigative research.
In his exchanges, Vince Palamara has shown courage and integrity.
I salute him and hope he will continue to fight the good fight.
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War." Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta." The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
Phil Dragoo Wrote:Charles for posing and Vince for addressing the multipoint query resets the gyros, compass, and gps locator.
Justice is the destination of our cybercade.
From Greer's I BRAKE FOR SNIPERS bumper sticker to Elmer Moore's badgering of Malcolm Perry and depiction of JFK as "a traitor" to its destruction of its files there is ample evidence of treason on the part of rogue agents.
Lee Oswald has had a multiply-sourced alibi for his absence from the alleged "nest" as well as doubly-proved absence of incriminating cheek GSR, FBI "expert" Cunningham's fantasy of the Mannlicher Carcano's "tight mechanism" to the contrary not withstanding.
Vincent Bugliosi has affixed a certificate of his evil complicity to the cathedral of public opinion with a thousand and a half pneumatic nails.
Jim DiEugenio removed that despicable vandalism in a ten-part Retrieving History from Bugliosi's BP Oil Spill.
This chapter is now rectified thanks to the courage and clarity of Charles, Vince, and Jim.
On to Justice (though the icons fall. . .to fiery karma)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4364[/ATTACH]
------
I so wish it were possible to post the ten part DiEugenio piece around the internet. That way it could wet the kindling of lies before the Tom Hanks government arsonist has a chance to light them.
Also there would be huge interest given that Hanks is basically narrating a gross of government disinformationist films coming up.
We need to go wide angle to general audiences, but again nobody seems to want to do that but myself. The DiEugenio ten part series is ideal because even newbies can use it to grasp the major points of contention.
DRAGO: As you know, in good conscience we have put our recent differences behind us, Vince. And in the spirit of our detente, I'd like to ask you, cordially, publicly and respectfully, to answer the following questions within the next 24 hours:
1. To the best of your knowledge, did Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone and not as part of a conspiracy to assassinate JFK, kill the president?
2. To the best of your knowledge, did Lee Harvey Oswald -- whether or not he acted alone -- aim a firearm at and discharge it with the hope of hitting JFK in Dallas, Texas at approximately 12:30 PM local time on November 22, 1963?
3. To the best of your knowledge, were any Secret Service agents, regardless of rank, complicit in a conspiracy to kill JFK in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963?
I sincerely thank you for your attention to these matters.
Peace,
PALAMARA: Thanks, Charles! To answer your questions above in order: 1. No ; 2. No- Barry Ernest's book has me convinced that, whatever role Oswald played that day, he was on the second floor lunchroom when JFK was killed!; 3. Yes, unfortunately. 1-3 are based on MY book, Ernest's book, Horne's books, and Douglass' book, primarily (but not exclusively). I told ya, Charlie- it is as if my 2007 "brain fart" never happened! Peace, Vince
PALAMARA: You have my permission to post this as my contract to the community
PALAMARA: P.S. I DESERVED your anger (and anyone else's, too) for my 2007 stupidity and for not thinking clearly then about the ramifications to my reputation, my RESEARCH (THAT is pretty important, huh?), and my (prior) conclusions. The "cult of celebrity" and my ego got the best of me. (And you can post that, too)
Credit is due: Vince indeed has proffered a "contract" of sorts to the JFK research community. I hope all of you will join me in extending to Vince the benefit of the doubt and respecting him for publishing his mea culpa.
And credit is due to you, as well, Charlie. You are a valuable member of the research community. I DESERVED the butt-kicking you gave me online- every word of it. Vince :O) P.S. Thanks to everyone else here, as well
