Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Has Lifton Cracked The Case?
#21
That's amazing, thanks very much. I do think he is credible as why would he lie, being black he obviously wasn't part of the 'clique' therefore is an independent observer in my opinion.
Reply
#22
Drew Phipps Wrote:
Malcolm John Wrote:Did they say that? Do you have a source for that?

Believe its Abraham Bolden, first African American Secret Service guy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Bolden

Bolden found a lot of trouble. You'll have to decide for yourself if he's credible or not.

I completely believe him. I saw him speak in Dallas a few years ago and there was not a dry eye in the room. His talk was so sincere and moving he got a standing O.
Reply
#23
I remembered this other reference to the route choice: According to Roger Stone in "Man Who Killed Kennedy," John Connally was the guy who insisted on the Trade Mart as the luncheon destination (causing a stink about it). Connally to JFK advance man Jerry Bruno: "Either we select the stops and run the trips, or the President can stay home." Cliff Carter (LBJ aide) also advocated the Trade Mart.

Stone: "The Secret Service favored the Women's Building for security reasons, and JFK staff preferred it for political reasons."

The Trade Mart destination forced the motorcade route through Dealy Plaza at low speed. When Chief Curry was conducting a 11/18 "trial run" of the motorcade route for SS Sorrells and Lawson, he turned LEFT on Houston Street (instead of right) and just pointed out the Stemmons Freeway to the two SS guys, who therefore had not actually driven through the last leg of the motorcade route.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply
#24
Thats what I had heard that they didn't go as far as Dealey Plaza, obviously incriminating Curry too though most of the senior members of Dallas police blatantly were implicated.

I am actually reading the Man Who Killed Kennedy right now but haven't got to that part yet. One thing about Connolly though, every picture and piece of footage you see of him he looks so blatantly like a guy very concerned not relaxed at all he is worried and nervous and clearly knows bullets are about to be flying very close to him, the complete opposite of how he should look, a motorcade in his home state with the President should have been one of the proudest days of his life.
Reply
#25
Also LBJ fought hard to have Connolly taken out of the car and Yarborough put in instead, obviously he failed, which I think supports that theory. I can just imagine the conversation between LBJ and Connolly when he told him he couldn't move him, 'don't worry they're professionals its a turkey shoot you'll be fine the shooters are rear and right can't miss' etc, amazing stuff. I also think his stetson might have been a way of identifying him as the one not to be shot, though I don't know if he always had that on such trips.
Reply
#26
Malcolm John Wrote:Also LBJ fought hard to have Connolly taken out of the car and Yarborough put in instead, obviously he failed, which I think supports that theory. I can just imagine the conversation between LBJ and Connolly when he told him he couldn't move him, 'don't worry they're professionals its a turkey shoot you'll be fine the shooters are rear and right can't miss' etc, amazing stuff. I also think his stetson might have been a way of identifying him as the one not to be shot, though I don't know if he always had that on such trips.

"My God! They're going to kill us all!" whereas I might be inclined to say "Holy sh*t! What the f*ck was that??!!"

Yes, he did look a wee bit sour faced that day, didn't he.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.

Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Reply
#27
Exactly, as in 'they're only supposed to kill him' thats what that says. We were in an earthquake once in LA in 1994, it woke us up, and those were my Dad's first words literally, its the natural thing to say when something unexpected happens.
Reply
#28
He's a Texan, so he's got a Stetson. I got one too. (Back in the day, every man had one.) It's only polite to wear them outdoors. You can't wear a cowboy hat in a good breeze either, unless you take the quite unmanly step of adding a chin strap (sorry, Aussies).

A Stetson in your lap is a bad signal for a gunman in the back.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply
#29
Why is that a bad signal I don't understand what you mean
Reply
#30
I can't believe Lifton would come out in public and say the Paines were not part of any conspiracy.



Unbelievable.



The Paines were central to the conspiracy and were Oswald and Marina's CIA safehouse handlers.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If the case against Oswald was legitimate Gil Jesus 0 208 04-07-2024, 12:11 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Government's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 489 10-12-2023, 12:08 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Govenment's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part II Gil Jesus 1 539 28-11-2023, 03:36 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Why the Government's case against Oswald is BS --- Part I Gil Jesus 1 572 15-11-2023, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald Gil Jesus 0 618 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Was the TFX Case a Scandal? Jim DiEugenio 0 2,286 04-02-2020, 11:58 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  The Uses of Public Relations in the JFK case Jim DiEugenio 0 1,901 11-01-2020, 05:41 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Finally: the Hammarskjold case is Moving Jim DiEugenio 14 16,228 04-09-2019, 10:34 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  The Tippit Case in the New Millenium Jim DiEugenio 192 203,835 23-06-2019, 10:25 AM
Last Post: Milo Reech
  A Case of Book Suppression Jim DiEugenio 4 6,910 27-04-2017, 01:37 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)