18-10-2016, 07:24 PM (This post was last modified: 18-10-2016, 09:12 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
Tom says,
Quote:In between posts by surrogates and Scott's incessant self-promotion amounting to thread drowning, non-stop advertisement, I had hoped for a discussion of a key question, who are (or at least examples of "tells" leading us to who implicated the one name the assassination was pinned on, and possibly, why.)
Tom,
Please understand there is a difference between genealogy, naming every mother, father, sister and brother and real evidence, I apologize if you're having a very difficult time in disguising the two.
I am NOT racist, so, I'm going to get that out of the way right now, in-fact I was married to a Mexican, but Tom, I could picture you in a courtroom on a ticket charge, and your client was a Mexican, you'd probably have him call in his entire family just to beat that parking ticket!
Although, this brother is connected to that brother who had a Library card. I think you have to do a little better then that.
My over zealous advertising and non stop thread-downing while promoting [facts] can't even be discredited by you!
What fascinates me more than your genealogy is the fact that Lee's signature on his Libary card is identical to the signature in my father's address book, and guess what? I am boasting!
Jim Hargrove Wrote:Hoover was confiscating "Oswald's" teen-aged school and employment records before making any substantial attempt to, as just one example, determine if anyone else in the U.S. government was being targeted for assassination. That suggests that he had prior knowledge of both the "Oswald project" and, in all likelihood, the limits of the conspirators' goals, i.e., to assassinate only JFK.
"Oswald" was on the FBI payroll while he was starring in the FPCC charade in New Orleans, and Hoover famously knew the very day after the hit that there was an "Oswald impostor" in Mexico City. To me, the Soviet/Cuban red herrings should have made some sense to both Hoover and, quickly enough, LBJ.
Jim, I think we're in agreement about what Hoover and LBJ really thought about MC. When I said the Soviet/Cuban angle "could not have made sense to them" I didn't mean that they were confused by it, but that they saw right through it and realized that neither the Soviets nor the Cubans would either involve a guy who had visited one of their embassies in a plot to assassinate a US president or set up a patsy whose false trail led right back to them. If that's indeed the case then their use of the Soviet/Cuban angle to sell the cover does raise some very disturbing questions about whether they had prior knowledge of the plot. I don't pretend to know the answer to that but nothing in that context about either Hoover or LBJ would shock me.
The fact that "Dial Ryder was brother of Jack Leslie Bowen's (John Ceasar Grossi's) wife..." and that Jack Bowen's name is on "Oswald's" alleged library card IS mildly interesting. It doesn't, however, prove that "Oswald" did or didn't go to Ryder's shop, or that Ryder did or didn't tell the truth in his various statements. It proves nothing.
Normally, though, I'd be inclined to mention it to John Armstrong, but I probably won't in this case. It just isn't worth it to me. If I did, and John added it to a write-up, you would surely accuse him of plagiarism, demand that I take down my website, and do all the things you usually do to be a pain in the ass. Why should I bother?
You accuse me of not responding to your post, although I just saw it today. (I don't read some of your often very long and barely relevant posts. What does Dial Ryder and his sister's husband have to do with the subject of this thread?) Your demand that I respond instantly to you is pretty funny, since when I demanded something like 17 times starting last January that you back up your claims of plagiarism, you just ran away and hid for months. Shall we resurrect that thread? I checked, and it's still on page 7 if you would like to finally answer it at this late date.
I have promoted the work of my friend John Armstrong for nearly 20 years now, not because I can't speak for myself, but because I think he has essentially solved this case. He can't name the shooters, and neither can anyone else honestly, but just about everything else becomes remarkably clear under his lens.
Quote:If I did, and John added it to a write-up, you would surely accuse him of plagiarism, demand that I take down my website, and do all the things you usually do to be a pain in the ass. Why should I bother?
Im sorry, but after reading this I couldn't stop laughing.
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Im sorry, but after reading this I couldn't stop laughing.
...or posting. It is an elephant in the room.
Peter Janney's uncle was Frank Pace, chairman of General Dynamics who enlisted law partners Roswell Gilpatric and Luce's brother-in-law, Maurice "Tex" Moore, in a trade of 16 percent of Gen. Dyn. stock in exchange for Henry Crown and his Material Service Corp. of Chicago, headed by Byfield's Sherman Hotel group's Pat Hoy. The Crown family and partner Conrad Hilton next benefitted from TFX, at the time, the most costly military contract award in the history of the world. Obama was sponsored by the Crowns and Pritzkers. So was Albert Jenner Peter Janney has preferred to write of an imaginary CIA assassination of his surrogate mother, Mary Meyer, but not a word about his Uncle Frank.
