Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jesse Ventura's JFK Conspiracy Program
#51
This is not complicated.

I agree, Jack, that we must recognize and negotiate the uninitiateds' learning curves AND grab their attention by utilizing the same forms of communication that are currently doing the grabbing.

In other words, we must be propagandists -- my word, not yours.

But we must never misinform, misdirect, or stray over the line that separates elegantly simple presentations from simple-minded butcherings of the greater, deeper truths.

Ventura seems to be on the side of the angels. But he is relatively easy to lampoon and even demonize. To the great unwashed, the credentials of a lying Bugliosi trump those of a truth-telling Ventura.

My point? Let's not put all our eggs in Jesse's basket when it comes to media allies. And let's not overestimate his value or underestimate his potential liabilities.

Charles
Reply
#52
Charles,

Haven't you seen it yet? Jesse defanged Bugliosi in a minute's time! Check it out.
It was astonishing to watch.
Really! I doubt that Vince will ever recover from this.

Jim


Charles Drago Wrote:This is not complicated.

I agree, Jack, that we must recognize and negotiate the uninitiateds' learning curves AND grab their attention by utilizing the same forms of communication that are currently doing the grabbing.

In other words, we must be propagandists -- my word, not yours.

But we must never misinform, misdirect, or stray over the line that separates elegantly simple presentations from simple-minded butcherings of the greater, deeper truths.

Ventura seems to be on the side of the angels. But he is relatively easy to lampoon and even demonize. To the great unwashed, the credentials of a lying Bugliosi trump those of a truth-telling Ventura.

My point? Let's not put all our eggs in Jesse's basket when it comes to media allies. And let's not overestimate his value or underestimate his potential liabilities.

Charles
Reply
#53
I'll spectate: [Image: popcorn.gif]
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"
Reply
#54
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Your write as though you believe the American people could be told it was Nelson and his buddies who took out JFK without explaining the role of the facilitators. I think that is a blunder as massive as you think the use of the term "mastermind" is a blunder. Americans can put together that Nixon, Bush, Ford, and LBJ were involved and that makes a great deal of sense. Then in a later round--the graduate seminar--you can explain to them that even more powerful and enduring interests were involved, such as the bankers, the oil men, and everyone else you have in mind. But, as a crucial preliminary step, it is indispensable to identify and nail the facilitators, which is what Jesse's show does so well--the best one-hour ever on JFK!

Jim,

You're fishing for phantasms.

I have neither written nor said anything of the sort. You are wrong about me in this regard -- absolutely wrong.

Here we are, about to re-open the old argument.

How the hell does labeling LBJ as a Sponsor (which the use of "mastermind" accomplishes, whether you accept that or not) "identify and nail facilitators"?

Here's an even more constructive question? Is "mastermind," for you, synonymous with "Sponsor" or "Facilitator"?
Reply
#55
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Charles,

Haven't you seen it yet? Jesse defanged Bugliosi in a minute's time! Check it out. It was astonishing to watch.
[B]Really!

Jim,

So in your opinion JV has fully discredited VB for all the world, and thus rendered his book wholly ineffective as a propaganda weapon targeted on future generations?

Charles
Reply
#56
We have been over this before. If you have any doubts, then reread our previous exchange. I am finding this more than mildly disconcerting.

Charles Drago Wrote:
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Your write as though you believe the American people could be told it was Nelson and his buddies who took out JFK without explaining the role of the facilitators. I think that is a blunder as massive as you think the use of the term "mastermind" is a blunder. Americans can put together that Nixon, Bush, Ford, and LBJ were involved and that makes a great deal of sense. Then in a later round--the graduate seminar--you can explain to them that even more powerful and enduring interests were involved, such as the bankers, the oil men, and everyone else you have in mind. But, as a crucial preliminary step, it is indispensable to identify and nail the facilitators, which is what Jesse's show does so well--the best one-hour ever on JFK!

Jim,

You're fishing for phantasms.

I have neither written nor said anything of the sort. You are wrong about me in this regard -- absolutely wrong.

Here we are, about to re-open the old argument.

How the hell does labeling LBJ as a Sponsor (which the use of "mastermind" accomplishes, whether you accept that or not) "identify and nail facilitators"?

Here's an even more constructive question? Is "mastermind," for you, synonymous with "Sponsor" or "Facilitator"?
Reply
#57
This tells me that YOU HAVEN'T SEEN IT YET. For God's sake, Charles, stop posting until you have! This is embarrassing. Really!

Charles Drago Wrote:
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Charles,

Haven't you seen it yet? Jesse defanged Bugliosi in a minute's time! Check it out. It was astonishing to watch.
[B]Really!

Jim,

So in your opinion JV has fully discredited VB for all the world, and thus rendered his book wholly ineffective as a propaganda weapon targeted on future generations?

Charles
Reply
#58
If the shooters in Dealey Plaza had missed their target as often as you miss my points, we wouldn't be enjoying this lovely exchange.

No embarrassment here, I'm afraid.
Reply
#59
The answer to your question, for everyone who sees it, is "Yes",
which you would appreciate if you had already watched the show.

Charles Drago Wrote:
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Charles,

Haven't you seen it yet? Jesse defanged Bugliosi in a minute's time! Check it out. It was astonishing to watch.
[B]Really!

Jim,

So in your opinion JV has fully discredited VB for all the world, and thus rendered his book wholly ineffective as a propaganda weapon targeted on future generations?

Charles
Reply
#60
James H. Fetzer Wrote:The answer to your question, for everyone who sees it, is "Yes",
which you would appreciate if you had already watched the show.

Charles Drago Wrote:
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Charles,

Haven't you seen it yet? Jesse defanged Bugliosi in a minute's time! Check it out. It was astonishing to watch.
[B]Really!

Jim,

So in your opinion JV has fully discredited VB for all the world, and thus rendered his book wholly ineffective as a propaganda weapon targeted on future generations?

Charles

Jesse clearly intimidated the Bug.

Jack
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  New Alt.Conspiracy.JFK Google Group Brian Doyle 0 497 21-11-2023, 04:47 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research Brian Doyle 1 751 07-07-2023, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Conclusion Gil Jesus 1 930 01-04-2023, 04:23 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Part IV Gil Jesus 0 693 26-03-2023, 02:10 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 747 15-03-2023, 11:34 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald Pt. 1 & 2 Gil Jesus 0 691 08-03-2023, 01:28 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  JFK Conspiracy for Younger Generations Cliff Varnell 1 2,913 02-06-2019, 11:17 AM
Last Post: Cliff Varnell
  JFK and Far Right Conspiracy Rhetoric Jim DiEugenio 4 9,367 02-01-2019, 06:14 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  rootclaim - Estimating the Probability of Conspiracy vs. LHO Acted Alone Bill Fite 11 10,534 29-04-2018, 05:08 PM
Last Post: Phil Dagosto
  Fuel for conspiracy theories -- The horror! The horror! Joseph McBride 8 9,049 19-10-2017, 10:53 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)