What? No discussion of Obama's COLB certificate today?

[Steve Franklin]

Apparently the forgers of the "new" COLB from Obama DID NOT
KNOW THAT COMPUTER GENERATED DOCUMENTS CAN BE
REVERSE ENGINEERED to retrace the steps of creation.

Here is a video of a computer reverse engineering which shows
that the faked document was created using ADOBE ILLUSTRATOR.
The operator shows that a technique called LAYERING was used
to assemble the various components. Watch as the computer peels
away various layers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yybrzkfSV...e=youtu.be

This is fraud at the presidential level. Despite Dawn and Peter
being willing to "excuse" Obama with a pass on this, it is an
IMPEACHABLE CRIME. Not to use a racial pun, but "the jig is up!"
He has committed a crime.

Even if not so, the presented document PROVES Obama is not
"native born", since it lists only ONE parent who is a US citizen.
The constitution says BOTH PARENTS MUST US CITIZENS.

This issue is NOT settled. With Obama joining the fight, it has
barely begun.

Jack

This rises to the level of Fetzer's notion that the government would use a particle beam weapon to bring down a private plane when a common wrench would have done just as well. If you're going to fake a birth certificate from 1961, you obtain a blank copy of the certificate and then type in the relevant information. Add a few signatures and you have it.

And where oh where does this notion of a "computer generated document" come from? All you have is a scan of the document--a series of pixels. There ARE NO layers. Even if there had been originally, you couldn't "reverse engineer" them from a computer image. The very fact that the guy in the video ends up with white spaces where the type was removed should have told you this.

[Jack White]

Apparently the forgers of the "new" COLB from Obama DID NOT
KNOW THAT COMPUTER GENERATED DOCUMENTS CAN BE
REVERSE ENGINEERED to retrace the steps of creation.

Here is a video of a computer reverse engineering which shows
that the faked document was created using ADOBE ILLUSTRATOR.
The operator shows that a technique called LAYERING was used
to assemble the various components. Watch as the computer peels
away various layers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yybrzkfSV...e=youtu.be

This is fraud at the presidential level. Despite Dawn and Peter
being willing to "excuse" Obama with a pass on this, it is an
IMPEACHABLE CRIME. Not to use a racial pun, but "the jig is up!"
He has committed a crime.

Even if not so, the presented document PROVES Obama is not
"native born", since it lists only ONE parent who is a US citizen.
The constitution says BOTH PARENTS MUST US CITIZENS.

This issue is NOT settled. With Obama joining the fight, it has
barely begun.

Jack

This rises to the level of Fetzer's notion that the government would use a particle beam weapon to bring down a private plane when a common wrench would have done just as well. If you're going to fake a birth certificate from 1961, you obtain a blank copy of the certificate and then type in the relevant information. Add a few signatures and you have it.

And where oh where does this notion of a "computer generated document" come from? All you have is a scan of the document--a series of pixels. There ARE NO layers. Even if there had been originally, you couldn't "reverse engineer" them from a computer image. The very fact that the guy in the video ends up with white spaces where the type was removed should have told you this.

Mr. Franklin clearly does not know what he is talking about.
Computer experts do know.

Jack

[Steve Franklin]

Apparently the forgers of the "new" COLB from Obama DID NOT
KNOW THAT COMPUTER GENERATED DOCUMENTS CAN BE
REVERSE ENGINEERED to retrace the steps of creation.

Here is a video of a computer reverse engineering which shows
that the faked document was created using ADOBE ILLUSTRATOR.
The operator shows that a technique called LAYERING was used
to assemble the various components. Watch as the computer peels
away various layers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yybrzkfSV...e=youtu.be

This is fraud at the presidential level. Despite Dawn and Peter
being willing to "excuse" Obama with a pass on this, it is an
IMPEACHABLE CRIME. Not to use a racial pun, but "the jig is up!"
He has committed a crime.

Even if not so, the presented document PROVES Obama is not
"native born", since it lists only ONE parent who is a US citizen.
The constitution says BOTH PARENTS MUST US CITIZENS.

This issue is NOT settled. With Obama joining the fight, it has
barely begun.

Jack

This rises to the level of Fetzer's notion that the government would use a particle beam weapon to bring down a private plane when a common wrench would have done just as well. If you're going to fake a birth certificate from 1961, you obtain a blank copy of the certificate and then type in the relevant information. Add a few signatures and you have it.

And where oh where does this notion of a "computer generated document" come from? All you have is a scan of the document--a series of pixels. There ARE NO layers. Even if there had been originally, you couldn't "reverse engineer" them from a computer image. The very fact that the guy in the video ends up with white spaces where the type was removed should have told you this.

Mr. Franklin clearly does not know what he is talking about.
Computer experts do know.

Jack

Jack clearly didn't bother to read the comments. Mr. Franklin, though not one of Jack's mythical "computer experts," knows what OCR is. Just a sampling of the comments for the video:

• Already debunked Gawker dot com
  It's called OCR (optical character recognition). Acrobat and many scanners do this by default. It detects letters and words on the page and allows you to add selectable text to the document without having to type it in manually.
  Notice how when you hide a layer, it's white behind it? If it was truly forged, you wouldn't see any of the background missing. It's white because it doesn't know what's behind the text BECAUSE THE TEXT WAS THERE WHEN IT WAS SCANNED.
  
  
  melora72 1 week ago
  

• YOU'RE AN IDIOT! YOU'VE ALREADY BEEN DEBUNKED!
  
• scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.
  
  
  bootpdx 6 days ago
  

Note that these are not Jack's mythical "computer experts." These are real people who have used the software in question and understand what the guy in the video actually did.

And again, in case anybody missed it the first time, IF this is a forgery, and I am not making a case either way, it is the good old fashioned kind. Do you seriously think that the minions of the president of the United States are incapable of laying their hands on a blank 1960s era Hawaiian birth certificate or even having one printed up? And do you not understand that there are still manual typewriters in circulation? Why do these folks insist on turning a low-tech operation like a forgery into a high-tech computer generated one?

And the appeal to authority: "Computer experts do know," just boggles my mind. This is the last thing I would expect on a forum that claims to be about deep politics. As Jim Fetzer would say, "This is astonishing!"

[Magda Hassan]

'Obama was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii': President's OWN literary agency promotional booklet from 1991 claims he WAS born in Africa

• Promotional authors pamphlet from publishing imprint Acton & Dystel says Obama - then president of the Harvard Law Review - was 'born in Kenya'
  
• Pamphlet edited by now-Dystal & Goderich literary editor Miriam Goderich
  
• President Obama published Hawaiian birth certificate last year in hopes to end 'birther' theories
  
  

By BETH STEBNERPUBLISHED: 20:23 GMT, 17 May 2012 | UPDATED: 22:05 GMT, 17 May 2012

Bio: The biography for Mr Obama published in a literary agency's promotional pamphlet says he was born in Kenya

The simmering political row over President Obama's heritage was dramatically reignited today as a 1991 booklet boldly announced that the Democrat was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.'In the cover for a 1991 promotional booklet by Mr Obama's then-publisher Acton & Dystel, he is as the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, (who) was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.'The information, which could be used as more ammunition against the incumbent, comes months before what will likely be a close campaign between Mr Obama and likely Republican nominee Mitt Romney.
The 36-page promotional booklet was exclusively obtained by Breitbart, and was sent out to colleagues within the publishing industry in the early 1990s.

More...

• Obama mocked for adding HIS achievements to former presidents' biographies on White House website
  
• New book claims Michelle Obama prepared divorce papers to separate from Barack - leaving him so depressed friends feared he'd kill himself
  

A later biography, which can still be found on Acton & Dystel's archives, reads: Barack Obama is the junior Democratic senator from Illinois and was the dynamic keynote speaker at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.
He was also the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review. He was born in Kenya to an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister and was raised in Indonesia, Hawaii, and Chicago. His first book, Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance, has been a long time New York Times bestseller.The blue, teal, and silver booklet was printed in part to celebrate Acton & Dystel's 15th anniversary, and also to display the breadth and depth of authors the imprint published.
Other authors featured include Ralph Nader, former Speaker of the House Thomas P. O'Neill, and pop group New Kids on the Block.Miriam Goderich, who now works at partner company Dystel & Goderich, is listed as the pamphlet's editor.An assistant for Ms Goderich told MailOnline that she was not commenting on the story at this time.Scroll down for videoDreams of my father: The 1991 pamphlet says Barack Obama was born in Kenya and raised in Hawaii and Indonesia; Mr Obama is pictured here with his father, Barack Obama Sr, in an undated 1960s photo

Controversy: Obama, pictured with his mother Ann Dunham in the 1960s. The president settled birther claims when he published his Hawaiian birth certificate publically last year

'LATEST INSTALLMENT OF WILDLY INCOMPETENT VETTING': PUNDITS TAKE AIM AT BREITBART

Pundits took to the Breitbart story like wildfire, with both the left and right coming up with heated responses to the article.
New York Magazine columnist Jonathan Chait writes that the controversy' was little more than the result of a lazy literary agent.'
He failed to see the pattern that Breitbart was trying to make, and notes: Breitbart is careful to tiptoe around (the birther shock angle.)'

Media Matters for America, a politically progressive watchdog group, calls the article the latest installment of the self-serious and wildly incompetent Breitbart.com-let "vetting" of President Obama.'
They point out an article published February 6, 1990 in the New York Times, which declares that Mr Obama, 28, was elected as the first black president to The Harvard Law Review.
It reads: His late father, Barack Obama, was a finance minister in Kenya and his mother, Ann Dunham, is an American anthropologist now doing fieldwork in Indonesia. Mr Obama was born in Hawaii.'



Though he no longer represents Mr Obama, Jay Acton spoke with Breitbart about the cover, saying that almost nobody' wrote their own biography, though non-athletes were probably' approached to confirm the veracity of it.Mr Obama later left Acton & Dystel, submitting a book proposal to Simon & Schuster imprint Poseidon Press worth more than six figures.The book, tentatively called Journeys In Black And White, was later abandoned for the autobiography Dreams From My Father.A note from Breitbart's senior management at the top of the article offers the following disclaimer: It is evidence not of the President's foreign origin, but that Barack Obama's public persona has perhaps been presented differently at different times.'President Obama released his birth certificate to the public last April. He said during a press briefing at the time that he was puzzled at the degree to which this thing just keeps going on.'He said: We've had every official in Hawaii, Democrat and Republican, every news outlet that has investigated this, confirm that, yes, in fact, I was born in Hawaii, August 4, 1961, in Kapiolani Hospital.'The president concluded his speech by acknowledging that some people - despite the evidence - would not let go of the issue.
'I know that there's going to be a segment of people for which, no matter what we put out, this issue will not be put to rest,' he said.
'But I'm speaking to the vast majority of the American people, as well as to the press. We do not have time for this kind of silliness. We've got better stuff to do. I've got better stuff to do.'Proof is in the papers: Mr Obama released his birth certificate last April to try and quiet a debate within Republican circles that he was not born in the country



Though the White House was certainly hoping to silence the birther' movement by releasing the president's birth certificate, grumbles and murmurs have been commonplace since the April 27, 2011 release.
'We've had every official in Hawaii, Democrat and Republican, every news outlet that has investigated this, confirm that, yes, in fact, I was born in Hawaii, August 4, 1961, in Kapiolani Hospital.'
-Mr Obama, addressing the press on April 27, 2011

On May 12, Colorado Republican Congressman Mike Coffman brought up the issue at a fundraiser, saying: I don't know whether Barack Obama was born in the United States of America.
'I don't know that. But I do know this that in his heart, he's not an American.He's just not an American.'According to 9 News, Rep Coffman was first met with silence, but after several moments, fundraiser attendees offered tentative applause.However, the congressman issued an apology later in the week, writing: I have confidence in President Obama's citizenship and legitimacy as President of the United States.'He further qualified his statement by saying: I don't believe the president shares my belief in American Exceptionalism. His policies reflect a philosophy that America is but one nation of many equals.As a Marine, I believe America is unique and based on a core set of principles that makes it superior to other nations.'

THE 'BIRTHER' DEBATE: WHO SUPPORTED IT AND WHY OBAMA CHOSE TO RELEASE HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE

Debated: Donald Trump led the 'birther' movement

Celebrity developer Donald Trump, who took the lead in sowing doubts about Mr Obama's birth, was gaining a following as he flirted with a Republican presidential bid.
A 2011 poll showed two-thirds of all Republicans - and smaller percentages of independents and Democrats - believing Mr Obama was born overseas or voicing uncertainty about his place of birth.
The public doubts about his birth, with their hints of xenophobic and even racist attitudes, threatened to feed broader suspicions and grievances among millions of Americans.
Unchallenged, those sentiments would linger through his re-election campaign, the Associated Press said in 2011.
Among many party activists, questioning Obama's birthplace - and thus his constitutional legitimacy as president - was a test of party allegiance.
Republican presidential hopefuls were forced into uncomfortable corners where they had to distance themselves from the birthers' claims without alienating potential voters.
Recognizing the potential backlash, Republican House Speaker John Boehner put some distance between the GOP establishment and the conspiracy theorists.
'This has long been a settled issue,' Boehner spokesman Brendan Buck said last April. 'The speaker's focus is on cutting spending, lowering gas prices and creating American jobs.'
What had given the issue its drive was the success critics such as Trump achieved by simply questioning why Mr Obama had not released the long-form version of his birth document.
The White House choreographed the release of the birth certificate.

Aides said Obama decided that he had had enough of the issue and asked his White House counsel, Bob Bauer, to look into getting a waiver from the state of Hawaii to release the document.

-Associated Press

Watch President Obama talk about his birth certificate
<font style="font-size: 1.2em; ">



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z1vCdiOZLd

[Kevin Hall]

So if true, is this not just more a part of the reason why he is in office? Just one more way that those who selected him are using him to distract and divide the county?
A gleeful, mocking, contempt for people who still believe they are living in a democracy?

[Carsten Wiethoff]

I am sitting on the sidelines regarding Obamas legitimacy but I had my doubts about his long form birth certificate in PDF form, especially after looking at it. Now an investigation initiated by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio finds that the President's long form birth certificate is "undoubtedly a fraud".
http://mcso.org/MultiMedia/PressRelease/...t%20II.pdf

Especially interesting is the technical analysis of the PDF file itself and its numerous "problems".
http://mcso.org/MultiMedia/PressRelease/...Report.pdf

[Magda Hassan]

Just putting it here for the record. Haven't had time to check it all out but some interest there any way.

OBAMA'S KENYAN BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES



WHERE LIES GO TO DIE Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama's birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain's Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives.

(Editors note: The records alluded to in this story were discovered through a May, 2012 search through BMD Registers, a BNA partner site, using the search term "Obama". Corroborating evidence through public sources only implicates the identity of those involved but does not explicitly prove their identity in the absence of the availability of original documents.)
By Dan Crosby
of The Daily Pen
KEW, SURREY, GB The last place anyone would think to look for a birth record of someone claiming to be a "natural born" U.S. citizen is Great Britain. The very inclusion of the Article II eligibility mandate in the U.S. Constitution was explicitly intended by the founding fathers of America to prevent a then British-born enemy usurper from attaining the office of the U.S. presidency and thereby undermining the sovereignty of the newly formed nation.
In the absence of honor, courage and justice on the part of those serving in the U.S. Congress and Federal Judiciary, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case investigative group has concluded the only law enforcement analysis of the image of Obama's alleged "Certificate of Live Birth" posted to a government website in April, 2011 and found it to be the product of criminal fraud and document forgery.
The seeming endless evidence against Obama has now taken investigators to the foreign archives of Great Britain wherein it has been discovered that vital events occurring under the jurisdiction of the British Colony in the Protectorate of East Africa prior to 1965 were recorded and held in the main office of the British Registrar in England until 1995 before being archived in the BNA.
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution's framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
Recall, investigative journalists working for Breitbart.com have already discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama's literary agent in which he claimed he was born in Kenya. Prior to Obama's ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya's legislative assembly. Since then information on Obama's ties has been curtailed by government officials as the Obama administration has coincidently paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya.
Also, the presence of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted for from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama, until three weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961 when she allegedly applied for college courses at the University of Washington. Theories about her whereabouts have included that she participated in the Air Lift America project as an exchange student and traveled to Nairobi as one of many recent highschool graduates (see AASF Report 1959-1961).
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama's family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II's birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled "Burack" and "Biraq") beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives' desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenya's Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).
The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives. According to researchers, Obama's line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated "privileged access" status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.
However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/docum...ecords.pdf
Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clintons arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.
OBAMA'S FATHER FAILED TO INCLUDE BIRTH OF "SON" ON INS APPLICATION
For someone who wanted to remain in America, it's difficult to imagine any reason why Barack Obama's alleged father, Barack the elder, would omit the birth of an "anchor baby" son on an application to extend his visa, just days after the birth occurred, unless…
The American people were told by Barack Obama, unequivocally, that his father was a former goat herder from Kenya. However, INS documents filed in the very same month after Obama's birth suggest the goat herding elder Obama didn't "get the memo" that he was a daddy.
On August 31[SUP]st[/SUP], 1961, just weeks after Obama's birth was allegedly registered in a regional office of the Hawaiian Health Department, Obama the elder neglected to name is newborn son on an application for extension of his temporary visa to stay in the U.S.
Obama's omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical given the fact that the acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama's application for an extension. The INS has long been more willing to extend the visa of a foreign parent of children born in the U.S., especially when the other parent is an American citizen.
Despite the recent release of a documentary film "Dreams From My Real Father" presenting evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not the biological father of the younger Obama, the elder Obama is the man named as the father on the digital image of Obama's alleged 1961 "Certificate of Live Birth" which was posted to the internet by the administration in April of 2011. The document image has since been forensically examined by law enforcement investigators and determined to be a digitally fabricated forgery using Adobe software.
THE UGLY TRUTH
However, the sad and pathetic truth about Obama's covert natal history and his illegitimacy lies at the bottom of a sordid pit of lies surrounding the paternity of his birth. Doubts about his identity, his eligibility, his intentions, his honesty and his honorability as a man stem from what appears to be an ugly truth about his mother's probable sexual involvement with multiple men associated with the radical socialist movement in 1960's Hawaii.
Obama and his horde of abettors defend an improbable narrative about his identity. The veracity of this narrative has been damaged under the weight of a steady stream of crushing evidence demonstrating more than 180 disparities and contradictions to Obama's claims of natal legitimacy as president.
If Obama's cause as a usurper of power is to avenge his father's culture, he made the worst possible error in lying about who he is. Vintage America is on to him. Their instincts are slowly turning Obama's fantasy of a socialist utopia for those he believes are humanity's offended into a laughingstock. By building his vision for America on clay feet of lies about his who he is, he has undermined any intention of doing something good and right. He is not to be trusted.
Moreover, Obama is learning the painful lesson that a message of "Hope and Change" means something vastly different to vintage America, the most powerful and affluent culture in human history, when that message has been proven to come from someone as audaciously dishonest and deceptively calculating as this son of otherness.
Recall, in 2011, it was reported by The Daily Pen after an investigation of the State of Hawaii's birth statistics collection protocols and vital records history that birth certificates are often amended after the birth while the original paper document is sealed under strict confidentiality rules when the identity of the father is either determined after birth or when the father named on the new version of the certificate has adopted or assumed paternal responsibility for the child.
In the latter case, the original birth record may not contain the biological father's name because the mother does not provide it, or it may list paternity as "unknown", but this version is kept confidential under HRS 571. In some cases, the biological father may not even know he is the father if the mother has had more than one sexual partner prior to the pregnancy. There was no DNA test in 1961, however the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report shows there were more than 1000 such "illegitimate" births reported in the state of Hawaii during that year, about 1 in 17.
Therefore, the paternity of the child at the actual time of the birth is not disclosed while the new amended certificate is upheld as the original version displaying the name of the newly identified or adoptive father as indistinguishable if different from the biological father. This law is meant to protect the child from stigmas resulting from illegitimacy, rape, incest or adultery. Under these circumstances it is not possible to know the paternal status of a child at birth unless the original birth record is made accessible by authorized persons under Hawaiian law.
However, notations indicating that a certificate contains updated paternal information would be typed or printed in the lower margin of the new certificate, below the signature section. This lower margin of the image of Obama's certificate has been shown by computer experts to be concealed by forgers using a "clipping mask". A clipping mask is a feature available in Adobe software which limits the viewable area on a document image through which only selected information can be seen. In the case of Obama's forged certificate, the information we have been allowed to see within the frame of the clipping mask may merely reflect an amended birth record while concealing notations of the amendments which exists in the lower margin outside the frame of the clipping mask.
Regardless of any level of truth about any individual piece of information in the image, overall, the final image is the product of criminals and liars.
If Obama is not the biological father, or if paternal information is listed on the original certificate as "unknown", the state of Hawaii keeps this information secret until a court orders the documents to be released for discovery purposes in determining Obama's eligibility. Thus far, courts have lacked courage to uphold the Constitution thereby propagating the greatest political fraud in American history. Judges are simply washing their hands of the issue by refusing to even consider actual evidence against Obama, denying citizens of justice and their Constitutional right to a redress of grievances, because they simply do not have the courage to face the legal crisis such a revelation would cause.
Cowardly judges refuse to allow any exposure Obama's actual natural born identity and, in their dereliction, have conjured a legal fantasy filled with pressurizing wrath in which a candidate's eligibility for president is not only declared legally uncontestable but is also automatically preeminent. In allowing this, judges have allowed a dangerous precedent in which any foreign invader can covertly usurp the power of the U.S. government simply by lying about their citizenship status and hiding documentation with the help of the American media and a complicit legal system.
THE MARRIAGE SHAM
On his application, when asked the name and address of his spouse, it appears Obama may have first written the name of his actual wife in Kenya before blacking it out and writing "Ann S. Dunham".
Despite evidence indicating that Obama was simultaneously married to a woman in Kenya, it is suspected that he claimed to be married to Dunham in order to use the marriage as leverage to remain in the U.S. There is no evidence or testimony that Obama ever loved Dunham or that the two had ever been engaged. The two did not live together before or after being married and there were no letters, no ring, no announcement or, most importantly, no legal marriage registration with the State of Hawaii.
Despite a complete void of documented proof of the marriage, it appears Dunham was granted a statutory divorce from Obama in 1964. However, images posted of the court documents from the decree contain no original documented proof of a marriage or legal documents showing that Obama was the father of Dunham's child. A review of the court documents shows that at least one document, perhaps an original birth certificate for baby Obama, was missing from the numbering sequence.
THE INS' PERSPECTIVE
Being legitimately married to a U.S. citizen would be a benefit toward allowing a foreign spouse to remain the U.S. However, no marriage license application or public announcement has ever been found to indicate that Obama and Dunham were ever married or that Obama had even divorced his Kenyan wife prior to an alleged wedding with Dunham. This fact supports the contents of memos from college and INS officials who expressed doubts about the legitimacy of Obama's relationship with Dunham, even questioning the motive of such a union between a teenage woman and a foreign student facing visa expiration just days after the birth of her child.
From the perspective of an INS agent, the circumstances surrounding Obama's relationship with Dunham would have raised suspicions. Immigration fraud was rampant during Hawaii's foreign birth accommodation era in the 1960's.
Since Obama was a foreigner wanting to extend his temporary visa, the INS certainly understood that by claiming a marriage to Dunham, it would promote INS approval of an extension, but in Dunham's case there was an added risk to the relationship for Obama…she was pregnant.
It appears, from the contents of documents in Obama's INS file, when pressed by INS agents and school officials on the actual validity of his relationship to Dunham and baby Obama, having certainly been advised of legal ramifications for lying, he refused to name Obama as his child but maintained that he was married to Dunham. This indicates that Obama was either not certain if he was the biological father, or that he knew he wasn't.
Under child protection laws in many states, including Hawaii, when the biological father is deceased or unidentified by the mother, the man who is married to the mother at the time she gives birth automatically becomes the father named on the official birth certificate until it is proven in court that he is not the biological father. "Mandatory Legitimacy" applies even if the birth is the result of adultery, when the mother is married at the time of birth, until paternity is successfully contested. Today, DNA testing allows for conclusive determinations about paternity, but in 1961, it was more difficult to determine paternity. Hawaii's child welfare statutes indicate the "statutory" father's name on the certificate may be removed by court order, if paternity is successfully contested, after a judge has decided the case in the interest of the child's welfare. This law is intended to protect the child if the mother dies.
DELUSIONS OF LEGITIMACY
Government officials in Hawaii, including Governor Neil Abercrombie, Lt. Governor Brian Schatz and former Hawaiian elections official, Tim Adams have all indicated that they could find no original record of Obama's alleged birth in any hospital in Hawaii in the course of their duties to verify his eligibility. The absence of verifiable birth documentation was so apparent that Schatz, serving as the chairman of the Democrat Party of Hawaii in 2008, refused to certify that Obama was indeed constitutionally eligible to hold the office of president when he submitted the Official Certification of Nomination of Obama. Schatz deferred the responsibility to Nancy Pelosi and DNC, and then Chair of the Hawaiian Elections Commission, Kevin Cronin. Cronin resigned suddenly after controversy surrounding his decision began to strain his relationship with the commission.
Ignorance, lies and lack of understanding about the difference between a medically verified birth and a legal registration of birth has confused the public about Obama's natal history and eligibility.
Liars and abettors in media and government, drudging on behalf of the Obama administration, have anchored their Alinsky-style ridicule of those questioning Obama's eligibility in a delusion that he must be legitimate because his birth was announced in two Hawaiian newspapers.
The elder Obama's name appears as the father of a newborn son in images of two birth announcements appearing in two Honolulu newspapers on August 13[SUP]th[/SUP] and 14[SUP]th[/SUP], 1961. Birth announcements in Hawaii in 1961 were published automatically from a birth registration list provided directly to the papers by the Hawaiian Department of Health. The notifications of births provided to the Health Department, however, were not only the product of information provided by hospitals and doctors, alone.
The distinction between the information used by the hospital to create a "Certificate of Live Birth" and the information used by the Department of Health to create a birth registration is that information used to create birth registrations were allowed to be submitted from anyone possessing credible information about the birth, including family members, witnesses or attendants, regardless of the actual location of the birth. Contrarily, the information on a "Live Birth" record must be verified and attested by a licensed medical doctor qualified to determine the characteristics of a live birth event. This is important in cases when a distinction was needed between a "still birth" and a baby that may have been born alive but then died upon delivery. In the latter case, both a birth certificate and a death certificate are required while a still birth requires only a death certificate because of the definition of a live birth under HRS 338-1.
Hawaii has a long history of allocating foreign births to the mother's claimed Hawaiian residence regardless of the actual location of the birth, which was in compliance with guidelines established by the National Center for Health Statistics in order to accurately attribute data from births with decadal Census figures. Unfortunately, these vital statistics reporting guidelines are not conducive with determining the natural born status of the child.
For example, the Bureau of Census in 1961 counted all residents by county regardless of their temporary absence at the time of the Census when the Census worker was able to identify residents of a county through the information provided by others. This applies even today.
Therefore, beginning in as early as 1933, it was determined that births must be accounted the same way for all usual residents regardless of the mother's location at the time of the event when that resident mother intended to return to that county. In Hawaii, if a child did not have an official certificate prior to the mother's return, the local Health Department was obligated to provide one under the Model State Vital Statistics Act of 1942, Section 8 of Hawaii's Public Health Regulations and HRS 338.

The impact of population figures on the Hawaii's economy and agency resources was very significant in 1961. The accuracy of the Census takes precedence over the accuracy and veracity of vital statistics in the U.S. Vital statistics are reported annually, but the Census only occurs every ten years which means there is large volume of population which goes untracked between Census years. If births and deaths were not allocated to the residents of each county, regardless of the location of the vital event, the results would cause large disparities when compared with the Census data.
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com.au/2012/...vered.html

[Ed Jewett]

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

New Evidence: Obama's Digital Birth Certificate; Metadata and Object Code Prove Forgery

OBAMARELEASE YOURRECORDS ON 12:22 PM |

Report: Metadata and object code proof of a forged birth certificate file!
By Mara Zebest
July 18th, 2012
___________________________

Mara Zebest is a graphic artist and co-author for a number of Adobe product books including the Inside Photoshop series which typically exceeded 1000 pages, and published in at least ten different languages around the world. Ms. Zebest is also tech editor for numerous books for both Adobe and Microsoft products and has worked closely with the Cold Case Posse (CCP) for Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO) in providing evidence on Obama's forged birth certificate.

____________________________

[TABLE="class: tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: tr-caption"]CLICK TO ENALRGE[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
My newly released report explains why Obama's long form birth certificate PDF file is a synthetically manufactured file down to the colors presented on eight of the first nine layers. The report examines the metadata and object code and explains how this information corroborates the claim that Obama's PDF file never originated as a paper document but rather was born in cyberspaceor to put it another waydigitally manufactured. The only time Obama's PDF file image exists as a paper document is when a computer user selects Print from the File menu. Obama's PDF file, like everything else from this administration, is a composite, a lie, an illusioneven down to the deceptive colors presented in the file.

The focus of this report is centered on Obama's PDF file released on April 27, 2011 and can be downloaded at this White House link. The moment Obama's PDF file was posted numerous professionals have been speaking out on the multitude of anomalies. Most notable indicator of malfeasance within Obama's PDF file is the presence of multiple layers. A document scanned into a computer should only containone layerknown as a flattened file. However, Obama's PDF file not only contained more than one layer, it contained nine layersthat clearly display recognizable signs of forgery along with a host of other manipulative indicators. The problems range from Tom Harrison's observation of undisturbed safety-paper pattern beneath white dots to a clipping mask path that hides data andmore.

Because layers are the most obvious symptom of foul play, it may be helpful to understand what layers are and what advantages layers provide. Layers are analogous to transparencies used on a projector inwhat will be referred to asthe analog world. Content is printed on separate sheets (or layers) which allow the user to move, add, or remove one sheet element independently of the remaining sheets. The total composite document is comprised of the combined transparency stack of sheets.

The digital equivalent allows a user to add or move digital image information (or text) onto separate layers. This of course would be a manual and manipulative choice. Like their analog parallel, layers can provide a means to maneuver individual elements within the image independently of surrounding image pieces.

The layers have been the most damning and problematic evidence of file manipulation and the defenders of Obama are quick to respond with a plethora of excuses to justify the presence of layers. The excuses range from OCR (Optical Character Recognition)software to the more predominant excuse of optimizationboth of which have been debunked in my previous report for the Cold Case Posse press conference.

Many Obama defenders have conceded that OCR is not a factor and admit OCR was never applied to the PDF file. However arguments for optimization still persist. Optimization refers to a file saving process in which the goal is to reduce the file size while maintaining (or optimizing) the quality of the image (as best as possible depending on the settings applied).

Those that insist on the optimization argument either do not understand what attributes need to be present for this argument to hold water, or they are hoping the general public does not understandprobably a little of both. The defenders certainly count on the ignorance of the average citizen to understand the differences in layers produced from an automated process (such as optimization) compared to a manual choice to manipulate the file. One goal of the report is to offer a deeper understanding for recognizing the two patterns of layering (and to avoid being deceived or bamboozled). The report adds additional proof along the way that the optimization excuse fails miserably and can be completely ruled out as a justification for layers.

[TABLE="class: tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: tr-caption"]CLICK TO ENALRGE[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
One particular and significant point to understand: Not all optimization processes are created equal andonly certain programs will create (automated) layers when optimizing. Adobe Acrobat Pro is the most commonly used program capable of creating layers from an automated process such as optimization but even Acrobat Pro does not always produce layers when optimizing a file. The method and settings applied during the saving process plays a factor in whether layers will be automatically generated or not. To be additionally clear on this point, programs like Photoshop and Illustrator will NOT automatically generate layers when optimizing a file (regardless of the circumstances). Any layered files generated from these programs are merely reflective of layersmanufactured by the USER.

The problems for the opposition increases when the metadata is considered; so what is metadata? If you've ever examined a file and noticed property information such as the creation date, modified date, or the program used to create the file, this is known asmetadata. The metadata for Obama's PDF reveals that a Mac-based program called Preview was used to generate the optimized PDF file.

Preview is a program that allows a user to open and view a file (as the name suggests). Preview can view a range of file types created from other programs as well as allowing a user to resave the file in any file format available within Preview. Preview is limited in its abilities and certainly not a program used to create a layered file from scratch. The optimization argument becomes increasingly problematic when it is understood that Preview is incapable of producing or generating layers automatically from an optimization process (when saving a file). Preview will only maintain preexisting layers produced from another program. Thus Obama's PDF layers had to be generated from another program prior to being saved from Preview.

One more important point regarding Preview's role in creating Obama's PDF file: If a file is produced in another program; opened and saved again within Preview, the metadata from any prior programs used are replaced with Preview metadata, thus eliminating any digital tracks for the previous programs utilized in the process (such as Photoshop or Illustrator that might imply manipulation).

Along with metadata, object code is also buried within the PDF filewhich refers to the code that describes the attributes or properties present for each file object (and can be seen by opening the PDF file in WordPad or Word). Layers within the Obama PDF file would be examples of objects described in the object code. The report examines the layer object code along with how the code properties can be applied in analyzing automated layersproduced in an Acrobat optimized documentagainst themanufactured layersproduced in Obama's PDF file. Visible and consistent patterns in optimized layers do not exist in Obama's PDF file.

[TABLE="class: tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: tr-caption"]CLICK TO ENALRGE[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
One of the object code properties examined will beBitsPerComponent (seen in the figure) which is typically followed by a numeric value of 1 or 8. To simplify, this refers to either a 1-bit layer or an 8-bitlayer respectively. In layman's language, a 1-bit layer that also contains an ImageMask true property (in the object code) equates to a layer that is only capable of containing one single colorblack. Conversely, an 8-bit (ColorSpace) layer is capable of containing more than one color; of any color value (not restricted to just black). If this concept is clear, then the rest is easy and the report will explain these concepts further.

The bottom line, documented in detail within thereport, is that an optimized layer pattern will only contain a single layer of 1-bit quality that displays black only. All remaining layers (in an optimized file) are 8-bitcontaining multiple colors. In other words, the optimization process pulls out all the black color onto one (1-bit) layernot two (1-bit) layers, not three (1-bit) layersjust one layer with this 1-bit object code attribute.

Obama's PDF file (as seen in the figure) contains EIGHT 1-bit layers, and none of these 1-bit layers reflect a black color. However, the colors presented are a deception. The black is there, but it's hidden in plain sight (as outlined in the report).

Taking into account the multiple 1-bit layers embedded in Obama's file, combined with the associated color manipulation defined in the report; it is impossible to duplicate these file attributes through scanning or any other argument thrown at the debate which currently includes:

• Optimization
  

• Adaptive compression
  

• MRC (Mixed Raster Content) compression
  

• JBIG2
  

• Adobe Acrobat Pro, and…
  

• OCR
  

[TABLE="class: tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: tr-caption"]CLICK TO ENALRGE[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Here's a challenge to anyone who would like to defend the list of excuses or to supplement any additional excuses: It would be advised (before doing so) to carefully read the report, examine the provided figure of object code for the nine layers found in Obama's PDF (with important properties highlighted). Then run tests to see if any of the describedsuppositions proposed in the above bulleted list (or any new excuses being considered) can produce object code exactly as seen in the capture (without manipulation). The final result must include eight 1-bitImage Mask true layers (with FlateDecode as seen in the figure), and one 8-bit ColorSpace layer (withDCTDecode as seen for this last layer). Oh, and as an added bonus, the 1-bit layers (all eight of them) need to have colors displayed that are NOT within a pure (grayscale color value) range of black.

When these displayed attributes from Obama's PDF anomalies are reproduced via scanning and optimization settingsplease publish the winning recipe settings for all to verify. And don't forget to include a refry from Preview as the last step. If you cannot document the winning recipe, then supposition does not count; and therefore you have nothingwhich falls into the category of misinformation, misunderstanding, misrepresenting, and misdirecting.

Obama's PDF object code properties cannot be reproduced without manufacturing and manipulating layers. Any layers produced through optimizing will result in a single 1-bit layer. Repeat: JUST ONE 1-bit layernot eight. In the case of adaptive compression, the color on the 1-bit layer will reflect a black color valuenot off-white, not greenish-black, nor greenish-gray (as displayed in Obama's PDF file).

The report will detail these concepts and provide a documented recipe on how the layers in Obama's PDF file can be replicated down to the metadata, object code, and low file size. Here's a hint: The only way it was possible was through complete image manipulation and manufacturing of layers. The winning recipe included Photoshop, Illustrator, and Preview (in that order).

NEW: Barack Obama's Forged LFBC Report - By Mara Zebest - July 18th, 2012

_________________________________________________________

Mara Zebest is a graphic artist and co-author for a number of Adobe product books including the Inside Photoshop series which typically exceeded 1000 pages, and published in at least ten different languages around the world. Ms. Zebest is also tech editor for numerous books for both Adobe and Microsoft products and has worked closely with the Cold Case Posse (CCP) for Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO) in providing evidence on Obama's forged birth certificate.

__________________________________________________________

WATCH THE COMPLETE SHERIFF JOE PRESS CONFERENCE ABOUT OBAMA'S FORGED IDENTITY DOCUMENTS HERE:http://www.art2superpac.com/joe.html

SHERIFF JOE TEA-PARTY PRESENTATION VIDEO HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/arizonavideo.html

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

New Ad - AZ Sheriff Arpaio - Obama Birth Cert & Draft Reg Card Are Forged! Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Ma...

Share on emailShare on printShare on twitterShare on facebookShare on myspaceShare on stumbleuponShare on digg|More Sharing ServicesMore Share Options

17 comments:

[Ed Jewett]

[TABLE="width: 798"]
[TR]
[TD]


"I didn't even know this history about myself"





[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]