Rich DellaRosa talks about the Other Zapruder film.

[Charles Drago]

So of course the question becomes, "Why were the films shown to you?"

I would suggest this answer: "To foster doubt, to create conflict, and to deflect attention."

For starters.

[Jan Klimkowski]

So of course the question becomes, "Why were the films shown to you?"

I would suggest this answer: "To foster doubt, to create conflict, and to deflect attention."

For starters.

I would add another question: "Would the Sponsors have commissioned their own film of the public execution of the American President?"

If so, why?

To be able to relive, to "celebrate", their Power - as some sort of ultimate Trophy film - in oak-panelled rooms, whilst slowly imbibing cognac?

Or to be shown to select researchers as per Charles' formulation of fostering doubt, creating conflict and deflecting attention?

Or to be channelled to the public at some future date, for unknown reasons which might include the reinfliction of mass trauma on the audience, the demonstration that Power can tell you what to believe, or more prosaically as leverage of some sort against one of the players?

[Jan Klimkowski]

As you may or may not already know, it appears possible that Rich, William, Milicent Craynor, Scott Myers, and I all saw the same film and it was not shot by Zapruder, but from a similar position. However, we could all have seen different films or all seen a few films--or--maybe, it was an un-altered version of the Zappy cartoon. The latter I do not see as likely...

Greg - thank you.

Does the notorious "red blob" of frame 313 (and 314) of Zapruder appear in this other film?

[JC Mahoney]

I think that is generally correct. As you may or may not already know, it appears possible that Rich, William, Milicent Craynor, Scott Myers, and I all saw the same film and it was not shot by Zapruder, but from a similar position. However, we could all have seen different films or all seen a few films--or--maybe, it was an un-altered version of the Zappy cartoon. The latter I do not see as likely...

Edited by Alex Jones, Double super triple double agent - Classified.

[Charles Drago]

So of course the question becomes, "Why were the films shown to you?"

I would suggest this answer: "To foster doubt, to create conflict, and to deflect attention."

For starters.

I would add another question: "Would the Sponsors have commissioned their own film of the public execution of the American President?"

If so, why?

To be able to relive, to "celebrate", their Power - as some sort of ultimate Trophy film - in oak-panelled rooms, whilst slowly imbibing cognac?

Or to be shown to select researchers as per Charles' formulation of fostering doubt, creating conflict and deflecting attention?

Or to be channelled to the public at some future date, for unknown reasons which might include the reinfliction of mass trauma on the audience, the demonstration that Power can tell you what to believe, or more prosaically as leverage of some sort against one of the players?

Yes.

There also are stories about an unaltered JFK snuff flick being used for training purposes in the U.S. and Israel.

For starters.

[Greg Burnham]

So of course the question becomes, "Why were the films shown to you?"

I would suggest this answer: "To foster doubt, to create conflict, and to deflect attention."

For starters.

I would add another question: "Would the Sponsors have commissioned their own film of the public execution of the American President?"

If so, why?

To be able to relive, to "celebrate", their Power - as some sort of ultimate Trophy film - in oak-panelled rooms, whilst slowly imbibing cognac?

Or to be shown to select researchers as per Charles' formulation of fostering doubt, creating conflict and deflecting attention?

Or to be channelled to the public at some future date, for unknown reasons which might include the reinfliction of mass trauma on the audience, the demonstration that Power can tell you what to believe, or more prosaically as leverage of some sort against one of the players?

Yes.

There also are stories about an unaltered JFK snuff flick being used for training purposes in the U.S. and Israel.

For starters.

Bingo.

[Greg Burnham]

Jim Fetzer interviewed me on his radio show. I am in the second half following Jesse Ventura.

[video]http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim fetzer real deal-gov ventura and greg burnham.mp3[/video]

A number of years ago the debate between those who saw the film and the LN/WC apologists became extremely heated. Ironically, the debate became even more heated because of folks who have a vested interest in the Zapruder film's authenticity and who are NOT Lone Nuts, like Groden and Tink. It was at that time that I swore off ever speaking about it again. It seemed to cause more division and uncertainty than anything else. So, Jim had to work hard to convince me to go on the air, but I did. I answer very few questions about it today. Some things I am not at liberty to discuss at all.

[Jan Klimkowski]

There also are stories about an unaltered JFK snuff flick being used for training purposes in the U.S. and Israel.

For starters.

I have heard some of those rumours.

A sniper training use of such a film feels to me mundane. A use that the Sponsors of the assassination would somehow regard as base and irreverent.

If the Sponsors owned such a film, I sense that they would regard it as more of a magical artefact, a resonant creation that they would treasure and use for its power to shock and traumatize.

Before Zapruder was made public, The Secret Film would have the power to create Trauma in any individual viewing it.

After Zapruder was made public, viewing of the The Secret Film would serve to create Fear, Doubt, Frustration, Anger - and provide proof that the world is not as we are told it is.

The perfect psyop aims to create Mass Psychosis and Paranoia.

[Greg Burnham]

There also are stories about an unaltered JFK snuff flick being used for training purposes in the U.S. and Israel.

For starters.

I have heard some of those rumours.

A sniper training use of such a film feels to me mundane. A use that the Sponsors of the assassination would somehow regard as base and irreverent.

If the Sponsors owned such a film, I sense that they would regard it as more of a magical artefact, a resonant creation that they would treasure and use for its power to shock and traumatize.

Before Zapruder was made public, The Secret Film would have the power to create Trauma in any individual viewing it.

After Zapruder was made public, viewing of the The Secret Film would serve to create Fear, Doubt, Frustration, Anger - and provide proof that the world is not as we are told it is.

The perfect psyop aims to create Mass Psychosis and Paranoia.

Jan,

Those are extremely insightful observations.

[JC Mahoney]

Help yourself to the kool-aid. It's just like going to sleep.