Title: The "other" film -- FAQs
Post by: admin on March 15, 2009, 06:51 AM=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
Since I appeared recently on Len Osanic's "Black Op" radio
program, I have been receiving several questions, I'll try and
answer them here:
1. Where can this film be viewed?
I really don't know. I believe that copies exist in various =
places around the world.
However I have no knowledge where it can be viewed. I never at any =
time possessed=20
a copy myself. When I saw it, the film was shown by a person =
unknown to me along
with some others in a suburb of Washington DC (College Park, MD).
2. Do you believe it is an unedited version of the Zapruder Film?
Personally, I do not believe the film is in any way a version of =
the Zapruder
film. The Z film appears amateurish to me and unrealistic in the =
sense that it
seems like an animated "cartoon". The "other" film seemed to be =
professionally
done with great color rendition and smooth panning. Additionally, =
I am unsure as=20
to whether Zapruder shot the film attributed to him. A French =
photo journalist
who saw the film on several occasions does refer to it as an =
unedited version
of the Z film FWIW.
3. What are the major discrepancies in what is seen on both films? =
The "other" film shows the limo on Houston Street as it turns onto =
Elm.
The Z film does not even though Z testified that he began filming =
when=20
the limo first came into view and did not stop filming until the =
limo left
the Plaza,
The 'other" film shows the limo making a wide turn onto Elm, =
nearly going=20
up on the curb and as though it first was headed to the service =
road in front
of the TSBD. Greer apparently struggled to navigate into the =
center of Elm.
The crowd appeared quite animated as the limo progressed down Elm =
St.
In the Z film, the crowd appears frozen.
In the "other" film, the Umbrella man is seem pumping the umbrella =
up and down,
not just holding it over his head. I've concluded that he may =
have been signaling
the various shooters to open fire -- that JFK was still alive. In =
the Z film the open
umbrella seems stationary except that a slight rotation can be =
detected.
The dark complected man with the cap alternately nicknamed TA (The =
Accomplice)
and The Cuban is seen in the "other" film motioning with an =
upraised arm while
he stepped into the street and was approaching the limo. He formed =
his up-raised
hand into a fist -- perhaps the infantryman's signal to "stop." I =
have concluded
that he was trying to attract Greer and Kellerman to stop the limo =
exactly at
his position -- which they did. the Limo was stopped ~2 to 3 =
seconds. The Z=20
film shows no stop.
The stop was so sudden that it jostled the occupants forward. A =
portion of this
forward motion can be detected in the extant Z film.
With the limo stopped, Greer turned to face JFK. At that moment =
JFK received=20
2 shots to the head: one from the rear causing his head to move =
forward slightly
and one to the right temple, fired from the front, resulting in a =
violent explosion
out the rear of JFK's head and sending a huge spray of blood and =
brain matter
toward DPD Officer Hargis hitting his helmet with what William =
Manchester
termed a "red sheet" and with such force that Hargis later said he =
thought he
himself was hit. This most gory explosion of matter is not =
accurately=20
portrayed in the extant Z Film.
Apparently once that Greer saw that JFK was hit, he then swung =
around and=20
accelerated the limo leaving Dealey Plaza and passing the lead car =
to entrance
the Stemmons freeway.
4. If the Zapruder film is altered, why did "they" leave in the =
explosive
head shot?
The first thing to keep in mind is that "they" never believed the =
Z film would
be viewed by the public. Members of the WC stated that they =
believed only
a few college professors would even read their report. With Time, =
Inc. and
the FBI controlling access to the Z film they could control who =
could view it=20
or even selected frames from it. If questioned, they could always =
say it was
being withheld due to concern over the Kennedy family's right to =
privacy.
In 1975, the extant Z film was shown on national TV on Geraldo =
Rivera's
"Goodnight America" program by Robert Groden. That segment
can be found on MPI's DVD Image Of An Assassination." The public
was shocked to see the head shot. To many, the Z film was proof =
of a
second gunman, one firing from the front. To counter those =
beliefs a
Nobel winning physicist (Luis Alvarez) concocted a "jet effect" =
theory to
explain how a shot from the TSBD could cause the violent "back and =
to the
left" reaction defying Newton's 2nd law of motion. Newton's second =
law of
motion can be formally stated as follows:
The acceleration of an object as produced by a net force is =
directly proportional=20
to the magnitude of the net force, in the same direction as the =
net force, and=20
inversely proportional to the mass of the object.
=
(
http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/GBSSCI/PH...u2l3a.html).
The alterationists IMO HAD to leave in the fatal head shot. They =
couldn't
very well claim that JFK was a victim of whiplash. At the =
necessary time
Dr Alvarez was dragged out to produce a total canard.
5. Why was the Zapruder film fabricated/altered?
IMO, and simply stated, the purposes of altering the Z film, in =
order of
priority, were:
a.. To remove all evidence of multiple shooters=20
b.. To remove evidence of shots from any direction but the rear =
if possible=20
c.. To remove evidence of Secret Service complicity
6. On 11/23, Dan Rather claimed to have viewed the Z film, the =
first
reporter to do so. He claimed that JFK's head was throw violently
forward not backward. How can that be?
IMO, he may have been shown an early attempt of an altered film =
in which
the frames were reversed. But it is possible that he saw NO film =
at all --
and he was instructed what to say. Keep in mind that on 11/22, =
Rather was
simply a TV reporter for the local Dallas CBS affiliate -- but =
virtually overnight
he was promoted to CBS's official White House Correspondent. Quid =
pro quo??
7. Will the "other" film ever become accessible to the public?
I truly doubt it. It is a dangerous property because that one =
film proves that
JFK was murdered as a part of a well planned and executed =
conspiracy. It
lays the WCR bare as an intentionally written pack of lies and =
proves the
complicity of the Secret Service, the FBI, and the highest levels =
of the
U.S government.
I have known of ~ a half dozen people who have seen the film in =
the distant,=20
past -- yet no two ever saw it in the same place at the same time. =
I truly
wish that someone would come foreward and report a more recent =
viewing.
I truly do.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
Title: Re: The "other" film -- FAQs
Post by: Walt Rollins on March 15, 2009, 11:52 AM=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
Rich, how did you come to view the film in the first place? Did =
someone invite you? Did a friend of yours know the presenter of the =
film? Was it a secret showing? How did those viewing it get the chance =
to see it? There might be some clues in your answers to find out where =
this film might have come from.......
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
Title: Re: The "other" film -- FAQs
Post by: Dean Hagerman on March 15, 2009, 12:26 PM=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
Rich you have already talked to me about the POV (Inside the =
Pergola)=20
Just a thought that you might want to add that into your post for =
members who have not heard your opinion on where the "other" films =
camera (i.e. Tri-pod in Betzner) or camera man was standing in Dealey =
Plaza.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
Title: Re: The "other" film -- FAQs
Post by: Rich DellaRosa on March 15, 2009, 01:59 PM=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
Quote from: Walt Rollins on Today at 11:52 AM
Rich, how did you come to view the film in the first place? Did =
someone invite you? Did a friend of yours know the presenter of the =
film? Was it a secret showing? How did those viewing it get the chance =
to see it? There might be some clues in your answers to find out where =
this film might have come from.......
Walt,
I mentioned that on the program.
In 1974-76, I was stationed at Andrews AFB outside DC. I was
working on a B.S. in Political Science part time. I used to =
attend
classes at the U of Maryland's main campus in College Park on
weekends. On Saturdays and Sundays classes were 3 hours each.
One each morning and one each afternoon. There was a break for
lunch in between. Some people studied, some went off campus
to eat, some brown-bagged it. Most of us just hung around.
On 2 occasions while I was there, word got around that if anyone
was interested, a film of the JFK assassination would be shown
at lunch in an empty classroom. I went, once before the Z film=20
was shown on TV, once again after. I had heard of this happening=20
at other colleges in that time period. So I went and a guy, =
unknown
to me, waited until a fair number of people arrived, and used a =
16mm
projector to show the film. I recall him running it twice each =
time.
Some of us joined in spontaneous discussions afterward. The first =
time
I assumed it was the Z film but no one said it was. The second =
time
I knew immediately that it wasn't the Z film. I remained silent =
about
these viewings for over 20 years.
I don't know where the film came from but recall that College Park
is only a short drive around the Beltway from both DC and NSA.
The guy with the film didn't identify himself and I don't recall =
anyone
asking him. At that time, I held a Top Secret/Crypto security =
clearance
and I was very accustomed to not asking questions.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
Title: Re: The "other" film -- FAQs
Post by: bfilmster on March 15, 2009, 03:45 PM=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
Rich,
