07-12-2009, 12:41 PM
I just read Part Two tonight and enjoyed it immensely.
The "trial" of Oswald would be a delight, the defense attorney doing as Jim DiEugenio does, demanding a la Charles Laughton, "were you lying then, are you lying now, or are you not and have always been a chronic and habitual liar!"
And the Tippet ballistic comedy capers, no rules of evidence, no chain of custody, just the DPD behind the curtain, "what type of bullets do you need--we'll provide them."
All in all a masterful presentation of a buffet of crow for Larry to "enjoy"--
As I've said, he suggests Hoffer's True Believer, Stalin's New Soviet Man, Orwell-Blair's Inner Party Member: incapable of recognizing any evidence contrary to the Party Line.
The "trial" of Oswald would be a delight, the defense attorney doing as Jim DiEugenio does, demanding a la Charles Laughton, "were you lying then, are you lying now, or are you not and have always been a chronic and habitual liar!"
And the Tippet ballistic comedy capers, no rules of evidence, no chain of custody, just the DPD behind the curtain, "what type of bullets do you need--we'll provide them."
All in all a masterful presentation of a buffet of crow for Larry to "enjoy"--
As I've said, he suggests Hoffer's True Believer, Stalin's New Soviet Man, Orwell-Blair's Inner Party Member: incapable of recognizing any evidence contrary to the Party Line.