09-09-2023, 06:02 PM
More organized effort to dishonestly avoid the issue with Kamp and his book has come from ROKC site member and Prayer Man cult member Greg Doudna on the Education Forum...
Greg wrote:
" The author suggests along the way but is understated and does not dominate the presentation. There is no Conclusion chapter in the author's voice as most books have, presenting a concluding interpretive synthesis or summary of argument, which either is or isn't an advantage or omission depending on perspective. There are no polemics, vendettas, or criticisms of other authors. A huge amount of primary source material organized and linked to between two covers. "
Greg conveniently avoids admitting that the reason Kamp does not make any conclusion is because he himself is aware that Prayer Man is not Oswald...Even Kamp himself refuses to endorse the bogus Prayer Man claim in his own work...Because the Prayer Man group has twisted the normal definitions of research so badly and forced it upside down on its head, Doudna actually credits this sign of Kamp's dishonesty and refusal to back his own theory as being a positive attribute instead of being the evidence of falseness that it is..."Depending on perspective"...Which is just another way of saying depending whether you are a member of the Prayer Man hijackers or not...Doudna then takes the low route and indirectly suggests those credible researchers who say Kamp is full of it and is trying to pass off a bogus theory are guilty of " polemics, vendettas, or criticisms of other authors. "...Nowhere in Doudna's review does he mention that Kamp is calling the woman employee Sarah Stanton Prayer "Man" or that this rotten tome is not only notorious in JFK research but is of the Alex Jones variety in general and stands as a threat to the Kennedy research cause...These people do not let facts get in the way of automatic sycophantic praise for what is basically a landmark book in bogus research...This book is a shibboleth to membership in the JFK internet clique...The fact it is an infamous hoax work that has caused serious harm to the reputation of JFK research is bad manners to mention...
Just waiting for that crowning ass Jim DiEugenio to stamp his approval of it in the form of a Kennedy & Kings article where Jim forgets the fact he admitted to me I had proven Prayer Man was Stanton - that is, before Jim put me on block...DiEugenio, the man who elected not to include the Prayer Man theory in Stone's documentary, is always noticeably absent at times like this...Something the clique pretends not to notice and forbids any mention of...
Greg wrote:
" The author suggests along the way but is understated and does not dominate the presentation. There is no Conclusion chapter in the author's voice as most books have, presenting a concluding interpretive synthesis or summary of argument, which either is or isn't an advantage or omission depending on perspective. There are no polemics, vendettas, or criticisms of other authors. A huge amount of primary source material organized and linked to between two covers. "
Greg conveniently avoids admitting that the reason Kamp does not make any conclusion is because he himself is aware that Prayer Man is not Oswald...Even Kamp himself refuses to endorse the bogus Prayer Man claim in his own work...Because the Prayer Man group has twisted the normal definitions of research so badly and forced it upside down on its head, Doudna actually credits this sign of Kamp's dishonesty and refusal to back his own theory as being a positive attribute instead of being the evidence of falseness that it is..."Depending on perspective"...Which is just another way of saying depending whether you are a member of the Prayer Man hijackers or not...Doudna then takes the low route and indirectly suggests those credible researchers who say Kamp is full of it and is trying to pass off a bogus theory are guilty of " polemics, vendettas, or criticisms of other authors. "...Nowhere in Doudna's review does he mention that Kamp is calling the woman employee Sarah Stanton Prayer "Man" or that this rotten tome is not only notorious in JFK research but is of the Alex Jones variety in general and stands as a threat to the Kennedy research cause...These people do not let facts get in the way of automatic sycophantic praise for what is basically a landmark book in bogus research...This book is a shibboleth to membership in the JFK internet clique...The fact it is an infamous hoax work that has caused serious harm to the reputation of JFK research is bad manners to mention...
Just waiting for that crowning ass Jim DiEugenio to stamp his approval of it in the form of a Kennedy & Kings article where Jim forgets the fact he admitted to me I had proven Prayer Man was Stanton - that is, before Jim put me on block...DiEugenio, the man who elected not to include the Prayer Man theory in Stone's documentary, is always noticeably absent at times like this...Something the clique pretends not to notice and forbids any mention of...