Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
McAdams loses Round Two
#1
McAdams lost at the administrative level. He has now lost in the court room.

He now says he will appeal.

https://kennedysandking.com/news-items/j...-blog-post

Note how McAdams's spin still controls the MSM. The writer says this was over a blog post. Not true. McAdams blogged on this several times, he would not let up. He then went on the radio, and gave it even wider coverage. That is when all the rightwing nuts started threatening the grad assistant Abbate.

When McAdams went on Fox, that is how he tried to spin it, as one blog post. And the MSM is still spinning it that way.
Reply
#2
Yea. He needs to get a new life.

I don't know how you deal with all the pro McMadman posters over at EF Jim. I was just over there it seems to have actually gotten worse. :Toilet:
Reply
#3
In a professional setting, some things are best handled in a professional manner amid a decorum of decency and respect for someone else's safety and well-being. Sadly, both parties have/are suffered/suffering due to the less than respectful and responsible actions of an elder.

Wish both parties well going forward, but it would make my day IF Professor McAdams makes a public apology and takes some responsibility here.
Reply
#4
Who are "both parties" Alan?
Reply
#5
My apologies, Mr. DiEugenio, for late response...momentarily sidetracked by an interesting video shared on a thread introduced by Super Mod Lauren Johnson ----> https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...Zc2UlR96M8

My reference to "both parties" meant the individual Professor McAdams' bullies @ disregarding their essential right to privacy, and, the professor himself to own up and take some responsibility for his gross indiscretions.

Cowboy up, McAdams?, or should I not hold my breath?
Reply
#6
Cheryl Abbate did not sue McAdams or Marquette.

Marquette took action against McAdams and he refused a compromise deal they offered.

So the parties are McAdams and Marquette, the action is wrongful termination.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  David Mantik vs Robert Wagner Round 3 Jim DiEugenio 0 8,754 07-09-2018, 07:10 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  McAdams gets new life Tom Bowden 3 13,668 11-07-2018, 01:05 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  John McAdams, Propagandist, to Publish "Critical Thinking" Disinformation Charles Drago 16 7,167 08-01-2011, 05:11 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Who Are: Mack, Perry, Russo, Zaid, Loomis, Pozner, McAdams, et al.?! Peter Lemkin 26 7,041 01-09-2009, 11:23 PM
Last Post: Myra Bronstein
  Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams John Geraghty 0 9,584 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  DiEugenio McAdams Debate Tonight 0 81 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  black op show mcADAMS AND JIM D..CANCELLED THIS EVENING Bernice Moore 0 1,710 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  McAdams gaffes again in Part 2 of Debate Gil Jesus 0 2,453 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  McAdams Bear Droppings Albert Doyle 0 2,067 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  David Mantik vs. John McAdams Jim DiEugenio 0 2,083 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)