Jim DiEugenio: Not to be Trusted

[Alan Ford]

[quote="Brian Doyle" pid="126496" dateline="1713284413"]
You are using trollish wordsmithing to avoid giving any answer what so ever to the fact your troll farm director Parker got caught by his own researcher, Zambanini, fishing for likely candidates to deny the cop seen by Mrs Garner with Truly was Baker...Obviously Parker did his usual evidence-fucking and looked for a bogus figure he could swap in in his obvious make-it-up-as-he-goes-along attempt to deny Mrs Garner's witnessing...You are trolling Alan and you avoided giving any answer to the FACT that once you disprove that cop being Lumpkin, as Parker falsely asserted, then he becomes Baker and therefore proves the Lunch Room Encounter...Parker knew he was nailed dead to rights by myself so he squirmed back to his censorship-protected troll farm and quit the debate - like he did every single time I debated him on McAdams' Newsgroup...Like Parker, you dishonestly dodged the point and tried to troll around it with obnoxious wordsmithing...Once Lumpkin is refuted "THE" cop becomes Baker and in turn proves the Encounter...Garner said "THE" cop instead of "a" cop because she knew she was specifically referring to Baker...

Did Mrs. Garner specifically use Baker's name? 

You already know the answer, Mr. Doyle, that's why you cannot produce anything factually to confirm that she did. There's a reason for that, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Piper's testimony shares that Mr. Truly was with someone else other than an unmistakably clad motorcycle officer in long black boots and an unmistakable white helmet. Facts matter, Mr. Doyle, your self-serving narrative is built on quicksand and every time you move to speak it's at the rapidly declining peril of your "evidence". 

Bonnie Ray saw Baker's helmet emerge above the boxes in sync with the timing for the Lunch Room Encounter...Your questioning that is just you trolling and nothing more...You failed to answer the point that the employees at the 4th Floor windows saw Bonnie Ray and the other negro workers arrive at the 4th Floor windows in sync with the Encounter...

Mr. Williams (Bonnie Ray) did see a white helmet and came to the reasonable conclusion that it was worn by a motorcycle officer; however, his testimony makes no mention of Mr. Truly in tow with that officer. There's a reason for that. Truly and Baker's phantom tandem exploits are mired in the stench of horse manure amid a hastily contrived script a day later to frame an innocent party (the wrongly-accused)... Facts matter, Mr. Doyle, take a look at Baker's same day affidavit...

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/...74&lon=750

There was no mention whatsoever in his same day affidavit about a phantom encounter over in the 2nd floor lunchroom...note the individual he encountered was, quote, "walking away from the stairway", unquote. Let that sink in, Mr. Doyle, facts matter.

You ROKC troll farm members are dishonest because the true context of Piper's testimony was a black worker was not about to give too much detail if he knew what was good for him...You are a dishonest troll Alan because you ignore the part where Piper said Truly was with a cop...In the meantime a voice stress analysis of Truly & Baker's CBS interview where they told of the Encounter would prove they were not lying...Your trolling ignores the recorded fact of all the pressure put on witnesses in the Depository and the subsequent lack of precise detail that followed...What your trolling is designed to conceal is the fact Piper never said that Truly didn't run in with Baker - which is what stands out the most for credible, non-troll researchers...What that weaseling punk Kamp and his foolish apologist DiEugenio are avoiding admitting is the fact that Baker left the Lunch Room Encounter off his 1st Day Affidavit because he knew it was Oswald's true location during the assassination and it exonerated him...DiEugenio and Kamp are failing to realize that this is evidence of when the cover-up started and they are committing a serious violation against good research under the protection of fools... 
What your Greg Parker-based trolling is doing is ignoring the fact that Buell Frazier recently said on a radio show that an un-named employee told him that a cheese sandwich and apple were seen on the 2nd Floor Lunch Room table after the assassination...That partly-eaten lunch is obviously the same lunch that Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald eating at that same table at 12:25 and corroborates her story...The research community prefers to destroy its own credibility by ignoring the fact that I have discovered one of the most important pieces of evidence in assassination research history in the form of Sarah Stanton's witnessing of Oswald waiting out on the 2nd Floor staircase landing for Mrs Reid to clear out the ladies from the 2nd Floor Lunch Room...This witnessing corroborates Carolyn Arnold and Frazier's witnessing of Oswald eating Lunch in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room like Oswald told Fritz...Because it disproved Prayer Man, the Prayer Man-hijacked Education Forum ignored it and continued to protect people who posted the already-debunked Prayer Man theory...One of the most important evidence discoveries goes ignored by the Education Forum with the moderators saying name-calling is more important than solving the case with no member questioning that absurd lack of accounting or how it erases the best solving of the case...
When I was banned from this forum in 2016 Peter Lemkin said I failed to understand the "ethos" of this forum and that was part of the reason why I was banned...Since then someone has gone in and lobotomized the member-protecting Deep Politics Forum rules that should have protected my good claim and kept me from being banned...The rules were with me in 2016 when I made my protest that my correct evidence was being ignored by the moderators...Under the moderators back then it was ignored and I ended up getting banned for 7 years...Since then they have dropped the previously stated purpose of the site to challenge the unfair moderation at the Education Forum and by doing so, and dropping the DPF rules, have assisted the EF in its mismanagement of JFK research...So those who said they understood the DPF ethos better have since managed to make the board a research desert where intelligent discussion is discouraged and strict silence is enforced...Their interpretation of the DPF's ethos is to gut the site of its previous purpose and engineer a victory for the Education Forum through self-destruction...And now, to add insult to injury, a demented member of the worst troll-type websites (MacRae, ROKC) now has free access to the forum to post his Greg Parker, Bart Kamp-type trolling - as if it wasn't bad enough...James Gordon had good partners in the DPF moderation and now the site openly lends itself to the worst rat-fucking trolls...



On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, the only issue here is your failure sir to accept that facts matter...i.e. the phantom 2nd floor lunchroom encounter was crafted to frame an innocent party. What part of Baker's same day affidavit don't you understand? 


[b]https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/...74&lon=750

There was no mention whatsoever in his same day affidavit about a phantom encounter over in the 2nd floor lunchroom...note the individual he actually encountered was, quote, "walking away from the stairway", unquote. Let that sink in, Mr. Doyle, facts matter.

[Brian Doyle]

Garner said Truly and "THE" cop...She didn't say Truly and "a" cop...She said Truly and "THE" cop...By the time of Garner's statement Truly & Baker's trip was well known so when Garner said "THE" cop she was definitely referring to Baker...

Alan, you are definitely not seriously interested in seeking the facts and are making obnoxious, trolling excuses...

I am not going to entertain the demented trolling of one of Parker/MacRae's leather-winged monkeys...

You are a troll Alan because you avoid answering for the fact that even if Truly was with someone else other than Baker (which he was not) that Mrs Garner saw Truly and a cop emerge at the exact time that proved the Lunch Room Encounter...This board demeans itself by allowing you to troll freely...

[Alan Ford]

Garner said Truly and "THE" cop...She didn't say Truly and "a" cop...She said Truly and "THE" cop...By the time of Garner's statement Truly & Baker's trip was well known so when Garner said "THE" cop she was definitely referring to Baker...

Wrong. A-G-A-I-N
You are merely making an assumption, no great surprise considering the source, h*llbent upon desperately pushing your self-serving false narrative about a chain of events you are six decades removed from, so the reasonable thing for you to do is reread Mr. Piper's actual testimony and how he describes the individual with Truly. Don't waste your time looking for any description of an unmistakable white helmet & long black-boots...I highly doubt, and with confidence, will say those reading along would come to the same conclusion that Mr. Piper knows the difference between a motorcycle clad officer in a white helmet and long black-boots and a gentleman in business attire, thus his FBI reference. How many Bureau agents do you know, Mr. Doyle, that don white motorcycle helmets and long black-boots? 

Alan, you are definitely not seriously interested in seeking the facts and are making obnoxious, trolling excuses...

On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, I'm simply asking you to share facts. That's a fairly easy request, especially for anyone who cares to share facts. Period. Spare us your "evidence" and align your posts with the available evidence. Nothing more, nothing less. 

I am not going to entertain the demented trolling of one of Parker/MacRae's leather-winged monkeys...

The great mystery then is how do you even entertain your own "evidence"? Go figure. 

You are a troll Alan because you avoid answering for the fact that even if Truly was with someone else other than Baker (which he was not) that Mrs Garner saw Truly and a cop emerge at the exact time that proved the Lunch Room Encounter...This board demeans itself by allowing you to troll freely...

The fictitious 2nd floor lunchroom encounter was crafted a day later amid a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to frame an innocent party (the wrongly accused). There's a major difference between Baker's same day affidavit encountering a man walking away from the stairway, than a phantom encounter crafted the next day inside a lunchroom with Truly, who was otherwise elsewhere in the building with someone in business attire. 

[Brian Doyle]

You're a troll Mr Ford...

You can't show what other cop would be with Truly at that time besides Baker (who was seen running towards the Depository front door before the Prayer Man trolls hijacked him and diverted him away from where he obviously was going)...The only cop that could be was Baker...You're just trolling and, like Parker, are just grabbing anybody you can swing in there other than Baker...That kind of ROKC trolling (and that is pure ROKC trolling) used to be disallowed on this site but I see Lauren and Magda now allow the worst MacRae/Parker-type trolls on the forum...

Your trolling technique hopes that the readers don't notice that you ignored the fact that Truly & Baker could be voice stress analyzed on their CBS appearance and show that they were telling the truth in their recounting of the Lunch Room Encounter...You also try to ignore that this isn't just limited to Piper...It also includes Garner and Williams who also saw Baker with Truly in sync with the Encounter...Heck, it even involves Stanton and Arnold who also saw or heard Oswald intending to be in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...And don't forget Fritz and Hosty who also heard Oswald say he was in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...Holmes verified the Encounter by corroborating Oswald "Went Downstairs" from the 2nd Floor Lunch Room to the Lobby... 

I'm just waiting for Jim DiEugenio to post a positive review now of Alan Ford and his trolling...

The JFK internet moderators are responsible for allowing these MacRae/Parker trolls to infest and damage JFK research...

I have a no blocking/banning rule that I follow out of principle because of its abuse against innocent people out on the JFK internet...However the only person I ever put on block was John Iacoletti only because his posting had no intention of ever honestly discussing the truth and was just out to nay-say troll any and everything I wrote...Alan Ford is obviously a demented troll who is merely disagreeing for trolling purposes and does not deserve board presence...I am putting him on block...

[Alan Ford]

[quote pid="126503" dateline="1713367182"]
Brian DoyleYou're a troll Mr Ford...

No, on the contrary, Mr. Doyle, I simply expose your weak assumptions always delivered void of facts. It's that simple really. 

You can't show what other cop would be with Truly at that time besides Baker (who was seen running towards the Depository front door before the Prayer Man trolls hijacked him and diverted him away from where he obviously was going)...The only cop that could be was Baker...You're just trolling and, like Parker, are just grabbing anybody you can swing in there other than Baker...That kind of ROKC trolling (and that is pure ROKC trolling) used to be disallowed on this site but I see Lauren and Magda now allow the worst MacRae/Parker-type trolls on the forum...

Wrong. A-G-A-I-N, Mr. Doyle, your weakness continues to be exposed because you cannot ever think outside your own assumptions. Here's a fair and quick question: How do any of us--far removed from that fateful day--could ever say conclusively that there was no motorcycle cop in his white helmet and long black-boots not posted in the rear of the building? We cannot with certainty, but the difference between you and the astute researchers is they don't foolishly follow false narratives.... while also bearing in mind that the security coverage that afternoon could indeed have had a white helmet motorcycle officer posted in the rear out of camera view, who could have rather easily charged in the building from the rear, thus being the white helmet figure Mr. Williams (Bonnie Ray) saw. To be clear, I'm not saying it happed that way, I'm just saying--in my experience in engaging w/you that you are quick to follow the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to frame an innocent party (the wrongly-accused) rather than exercise some critical-thinking. All you need to know is how Mr. Piper described the individual accompanying Mr. Truly that afternoon, and you can bet the farm whoever he was he wasn't wearing an unmistakable white helmet and long black-boots to be confused with the actual person w/Truly in business attire. 

Your trolling technique hopes that the readers don't notice that you ignored the fact that Truly & Baker could be voice stress analyzed on their CBS appearance and show that they were telling the truth in their recounting of the Lunch Room Encounter...You also try to ignore that this isn't just limited to Piper...It also includes Garner and Williams who also saw Baker with Truly in sync with the Encounter...Heck, it even involves Stanton and Arnold who also saw or heard Oswald intending to be in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...And don't forget Fritz and Hosty who also heard Oswald say he was in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...Holmes verified the Encounter by corroborating Oswald "Went Downstairs" from the 2nd Floor Lunch Room to the Lobby....

Let me let you in on a lil' secret, Mr. Doyle, ten (10) years ago next month in May, I knew the lying rooftop tandem of Truly & Baker were outright lying from the start when I discovered the following two exchanges in my personal research reading...Baker--in his Warren Commission testimony asserted that he and Truly were atop the TSBD roof for, quote, "10 minutes". I knew they were lying because later in Baker's testimony he said he saw Inspector Sawyer...

Mr. BAKEB. The next thing that I noticed was Inspector Sawyer, he was on one of those floors there, he is a police inspector.
Mr. DULLES. City of Dallas Police?
Mr. BAKER. Yes, sir. 

Now note just how long Inspector Sawyer was in the building, which means Baker couldn't have been on the rooftop at the same time he claims to have seen Inspector Sawyer.

Mr. SAWPER. To look around on the floor. How long it took to go up, it couldn’t have been over 3 minutes at the most from the time We left, got up and back down.
Mr. BELIN. Then that would put it around no sooner than 12:37, if you heard the call at 12 :34?
Mr. SAWYER. Yes, sir.

Thus, Baker couldn't have been in two places all at once, sharing space w/Inspector Sawyer while lying about being with Truly on the TSBD rooftop. I've never believed anything he and Truly ever said from that point on. 

Liars lie...there was no phantom 2nd floor lunchroom encounter. The lying rooftop tandem of Baker & Truly simply followed a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to frame an innocent party (the wrongly-accused). Moreover, I discovered an affidavit written by a Dallas County Sheriff's Deputy climbing the back stairs in the same timing sequence albeit 4-5 minutes after Baker and Truly's make believe exploits, where the deputy, upon trying to access the same rooftop as Baker and Truly found it locked from the inside. Liars lie, especially when there's a hastily contrived script to follow to frame an innocent party (the wrongly-accused).

"Few men have the virtue to withstand the highest bidder" --George Washington

I'm just waiting for Jim DiEugenio to post a positive review now of Alan Ford and his trolling...

Mr. DiEugenio is a fine man and an exemplary researcher on the side of light, truth and justice. He owes me nothing but to continue shedding light, truth and justice on this 60+ year old mystery. 

The JFK internet moderators are responsible for allowing these MacRae/Parker trolls to infest and damage JFK research...

On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, some people just seek the Truth, instead of falling gullible to a self-serving false narrative about a woman having a sex change right there on the TSBD entrance steps, while becoming a MUCH smaller male figure on the opposite side of the entrance. Facts matter, Mr. Doyle. 

I have a no blocking/banning rule that I follow out of principle because of its abuse against innocent people out on the JFK internet...However the only person I ever put on block was John Iacoletti only because his posting had no intention of ever honestly discussing the truth and was just out to nay-say troll any and everything I wrote...Alan Ford is obviously a demented troll who is merely disagreeing for trolling purposes and does not deserve board presence...I am putting him on block....


I get it it's not easy to overcome the exemplary research challenges of researchers like Mr. Iacoletti and myself. Lest you forget, just remember this, the wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.
[/quote]

[Alan Ford]

For your review, Mr. Doyle, and in fairness to those reading along as well, thought I would share Deputy Sheriff John Wiseman's affidavit ---->

[color=#000000][size=12][font=verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif]COUNTY OF DALLAS
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION REPORT
Name of Compainant
Assassination Of President Kennedy
Offense
John Wiseman, Deputy Sheriff, Dallas County Sheriff's Department.
Date Nov 23, 1963
I was standing in front of the Sheriff's Office at 505 Main Street, Dallas when the President passed and the car went around the corner and a few more cars had passed when I heard a shot and I knew something had happened. I ran at once to the corner of Houston and Main Street and out into the street when the second and third shots ran out. I ran on across Houston Street, then across the park to where a policeman was having trouble with his motorcycle and I saw a man laying on the grass. This man laying on the grass said the shots came from the building and he was pointing to the old Sexton Building. I talked to Marilyn Sitzman, 202 S. Lancaster who said her boss, Abraham Zaprutes, RI 8 6071, had movies of the shooting. She said the shots came from that way and she pointed at the old Sexton Building. I ran at once to the Sexton Building and went in. I asks some woman how many doors lead out of the building and she said 4. I left the building and found some DPD patrolmen and we came back to the building. I ran up the stairs and the patrolman started trying to get more help to search the building. I went up the stairs to the 7th floor and started up into the attic and noticed that [b]the door to the roof was locked on the inside.

Once more for good measure, quote, "the door to the roof was locked on the inside", unquote. Note that Deputy Wiseman followed the same path up the TSBD backstairs as Baker & Truly claimed they did, yet he does not mention hearing them in his report, let alone seeing them individually and/or together in tandem. Moreover, Mr. Doyle, How did Baker & Truly access that otherwise locked roof from the inside?

Oh, let me guess, the so-called "magic-bullet" retraced its fictitious path all the way back from Parkland Hospital back to Dealey Plaza, zipped & zagged up the backstairs and magically teleported Baker & Truly beyond the stark reality of an otherwise locked roof from the inside...please excuse the eye-roll.

There was no phantom 2nd floor lunchroom encounter. That crafty fiction was nothing more than part of a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to frame an innocent party (the wrongly-accused). It's amazing what some people will say and do for thirty pieces of silver...

"Few men have the virtue to withstand the highest bidder" -- George Washington

“The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie--deliberate, contrived and dishonest--but the myth--persistent, persuasive and unrealistic" -- John Fitzgerald Kennedy

[Alan Ford]

More troubling for Baker & Truly's credibility than Dallas Deputy Sheriff's John Wiseman's affidavit sharing that access to the roof was locked from the inside, thus negating their phantom experience atop the roof, is the following exchange an hour later when a Dallas Fire Engine crew brought a ladder to the scene to make an attempt to access the roof from Deputy Sheriff John Wiseman's viewpoint, where they were also unsuccessful as they experienced an even greater challenging issue that made the rooftop inaccessible...here's what that ladder crew team ran into...

@ 1:33PM (an hour after Baker & Truly's bs about being atop that roof for 10-15 minutes, their words, not mine, but no great surprise since they were already lying about a phantom 2nd floor encounter in the lunchroom) the fire engine ladder crew reported to their dispatcher the following challenge while trying to access the roof, quote,
"Sheetmetal has to be raised", unquote. Yet Baker & Truly magically were teleported not only upon a roof that was locked from the inside but also managed to magically make the sheetmetal a non issue as well. 

It's amazing what some people will do and say for thirty pieces of silver about a phantom 2nd floor encounter in the lunchroom and being atop an otherwise locked roof from the inside. Oh, dear @ the desperation of a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to frame an innocent party (the wrongly-accused).  

"Few men have the virtue to withstand the highest bidder" -- George Washington

Rather interesting that Roy Truly did not sign his original affidavit, nor was it witnessed by a Notary either ---->

Guess at that point he was hedging his bets and making sure he could leave the hastily contrived script open for do-overs, retakes, etc.

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/...8979/m1/1/

too bad he and Baker parroted back a phantom 2nd floor lunchroom encounter and a make-believe romp upon an otherwise locked roof from the inside reinforced with sheetmetal. That fiction couldn't pass the test of time amid a much more closer examination of their fictitious exploits.

The wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.

[Alan Ford]

Have to give Baker some credit where credit is due. At least he cared initially to tell the truth in his same day affidavit, where he swore the only individual he encountered was nowhere near let alone inside the 2nd floor lunchroom ----->

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/...7201/m1/1/

and, also to his credit, I'm left wondering if at some point doing the constant rehearsals to regurgitate the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to frame an innocent party (the wrongly-accused) if Baker's conscience was trying to summon the courage to do the right thing. especially when his sulky, deflated demeanor at one point during his WC testimony prompted the following...

Mr. BELIN. Officer Baker, when you talk, I wonder if you would look at me, we might be able to hear a little bit better. Would you tell us what else you did? 

At this make or break moment, Baker had the choice to summon the immense courage of American Revolutionary Hero Nathan Hale and do the right thing, but alas courage like that doesn't grow on trees, so rather than call out the charade of the proceedings for what they were, he made a choice to sit up straighter in his chair, make full eye-contact, and speak louder to carry on with parroting back the hastily contrived script in spite of the foreshadowing gloom and doom it would cast over a once vibrant and open Democracy. 

A duly elected representative of the American People was assassinated in broad daylight by the sinister wing of the ominous deep-state. Bunch of lying treasonous cowards. The wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.

[Alan Ford]

Did the so-called "magic-bullet" zig & zag its way back from Parkland Hospital all the way back to Dealey Plaza to make Baker and Truly magically invisible on those backstairs shared by the following six (6) people who also travelled those same backstairs?  

Mr. NORMAN. To come down from the flfth floor? 
Mr. MCCLOY. Yes. From the time you first heard the shot. and saw what was going on in the motorcade and then ran down toward the western end of the building and then as I understand your testimony, you left there and went down to the-did you go down to the fourth floor or did you go all the way down? 
Mr. NOBMAN. I believe we went all the way. 
Mr. MCCLOY. Until you got down to the first floor, how much would you say was the entire length of that time, from the first shot until you got down on the first floor?
Mr. NORMAN. Oh, I would say somewhere between 10 or 15 minutes, somewhere like that. 
Mr. MCCLOY. I don’t think I have any other questions.

No more follow-up questions indeed, Mr. McCloy, because Mr. Norman (Harold) to the detriment of the hastily contrived script to frame an innocent party is making it crystal clear that not only did Dallas Deputy Sheriff John Wiseman not see Baker nor Truly individually nor together in tandem, that he and Mr. Williams (Bonnie Ray) and Mr. Jarman (James "Junior") also did not see either Baker nor Truly in tandem together though they all shared the same route path on those backstairs that Baker & Truly claimed they did.  No one has ever stepped forward to corroborate Baker & Truly's phantom exploits on those well travelled backstairs. Why is that? 

There's a reason for that: the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to frame an innocent party was fictitious from the very beginning. There was no phantom 2nd floor lunchroom encounter, nor a magical teleportation through an otherwise locked roof from the inside either, let alone a magical wand to overcome the sheetmetal challenge as well. 

The only individual who accompanied Mr. Truly on those backstairs--in the initial few minutes after the cowardly ambush of an unarmed representative of the People that fateful afternoon--is best described in TSBD employee Mr. Piper's (Eddie) testimony ---->

Mr. BALL. You mentioned you saw Truly? 
Mr. PIPER. I don’t know whether it was a policeman or FBI or who it was, but another fellow was with him. 
Mr. BALL. And where were you?
 Mr. PIPER. Standing right there where they make coffee. 
Mr. BALL. What did they do? 
Mr. PIPER. He ran in and yelled, “Where is the elevator?” And I said, “I don’t know, sir, Mr. Truly.” They taken off and went on up the stairway and that’s all I know about that. 

It goes without saying that Mr. Piper, a Dallas resident for sometime preceding the assassination--knew the difference between the distinct outfit of a white helmeted motorcycle officer in long black-boots than to make any reference to such a distinctly dressed figure as a FBI agent in business attire. 

Making matters far worse for the hastily contrived script to frame an innocent party is the fact that TSBD employee Ms. Adams (Victoria Elizabeth), accompanied by a fellow coworker, Ms. Styles (Sandra) came down those same backstairs that Baker & Truly claimed to be running up together also did not see, nor hear them. Quite odd, given the backstairs were rather old, wooden and rickety.  

Deputy Sheriff John Wiseman did not see, nor hear Baker and Truly either individually or in tandem
Ms. Adams & Ms. Styles did not see, nor hear Baker and Truly either individually or in tandem
Completing the hattrick is the trio of Mr. Norman, Mr. Williams and Mr. Jarman, who, you guessed it, also did not see, nor hear Baker and Truly in tandem together, yet all of the above mentioned shared the same space--those old wooden, rickety steps--in the same time sequence of Baker and Truly's fictitious claims amid a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to frame an innocent party (the wrongly-accused). 

There was no 2nd floor lunchroom encounter. The wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.

*Update (Thursday, April 25, 2024) @ 11:12AM EST
With due credit to this exemplary website, I will be using their member "Away Status" feature before signing out today ---->

Away Information
Away Status:
I'm Away I'm Here
Away Reason:
Return Date:

So, please be mindful in my absence of anyone else using my name prior to my designated return (09/12/2024). Not sure how that happened over on Mr. MacRae's site, nevertheless, I trust it won't happen here. I will be using the time away to continue tweaking and fine tuning some of my images of Prayer Man with a friend who worked at the former Kodak camera facility in Rochester, NY and an acquaintance down in Northern Virginia as well. I will share that content in its preliminary form in a new post before taking leave today, and hope to return this Fall with further enhanced images. Best wishes to all for a safe, healthy and wonderful Summer ahead.

[Alan Ford]

Will continue to tweak, refine and further enhance my following PM photos over the Summer. A safe, wonderful, healthy & happy Summer to all. G-d willing hope to be back this Fall.


PM enhancement photos (A) 


PM Photo (B) enhancement

Over to my profile to record my "Away" status and date of return this Fall (Thursday, September 12, 2024)

Away Status:
I'm Away I'm Here
Away Reason:
Spring & Summer hiatus back in the Fall
Return Date: 12 September 2024