04-05-2025, 08:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-05-2025, 04:55 PM by Brian Doyle.)
The Victoria Adams story is very good evidence of a conspiracy however when the chance finally came to tell it on a public stage with Congressional attention, both Stone and DiEugenio failed to explain it in a way that related its damning meaning the best...Every time DiEugenio & Stone explained Adams' encounter they confused the details in an incomprehensive manner that doesn't convey it clearly enough...Stone takes the lead and sounds like he's struggling to remember the details and DiEugenio provides facts but fails to convey the full meaning of the event...They are like Jack Lemmon in 'China Syndrome' where he froze up and failed to get the story across...
DiEugenio & Stone should have done their homework better and had the best version ready to be explained to a public hearing it for the first time...They should have explained that seeing JFK's head blown open gave the girls an adrenaline boost that caused them to bolt from the window...Mrs Garner said Adams & Styles were gone before the limousine went under the Triple Overpass...This means the girls started down the stairs 20 to 25 seconds after the shots...If Mrs Garner got to the 4th Floor staircase landing 30 to 35 seconds after the shots that means she is the witness to Oswald not being there 65 seconds after the shots when the official story needed him there...Mrs Garner stayed at the 4th Floor staircase landing because she was a supervisor who wanted to wait for her returning employees...DiEugenio & Stone should have had a model of the NW staircase and pointer to make it more understandable...Their failing to give a clear explanation of Adams & Garners' witnessing fell short of both the evidence and opportunity...They should have said outright that Mrs Garner's not seeing Oswald at the time the Warren Commission needed him running past the 4th Floor landing at 65 seconds after the shots is proof Oswald was in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...The failing member here is "agnostic" Jim D and the pathetic internet sycophants who put him there...He's the one who needed to say that and blew the opportunity...
DiEugenio & Stone should have done their homework better and had the best version ready to be explained to a public hearing it for the first time...They should have explained that seeing JFK's head blown open gave the girls an adrenaline boost that caused them to bolt from the window...Mrs Garner said Adams & Styles were gone before the limousine went under the Triple Overpass...This means the girls started down the stairs 20 to 25 seconds after the shots...If Mrs Garner got to the 4th Floor staircase landing 30 to 35 seconds after the shots that means she is the witness to Oswald not being there 65 seconds after the shots when the official story needed him there...Mrs Garner stayed at the 4th Floor staircase landing because she was a supervisor who wanted to wait for her returning employees...DiEugenio & Stone should have had a model of the NW staircase and pointer to make it more understandable...Their failing to give a clear explanation of Adams & Garners' witnessing fell short of both the evidence and opportunity...They should have said outright that Mrs Garner's not seeing Oswald at the time the Warren Commission needed him running past the 4th Floor landing at 65 seconds after the shots is proof Oswald was in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...The failing member here is "agnostic" Jim D and the pathetic internet sycophants who put him there...He's the one who needed to say that and blew the opportunity...