29-06-2010, 08:03 PM
I've narrowed it down to a day without the letter "y" in it.
|
Lone Assassin Question?
|
29-06-2010, 09:21 PM
"Oswald" is a term of art for Dulles, Lansdale, Johnson, Hoover et al.
They acquired "the rifle" in February; the biological Oswald did not: http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard...85804&page= The ever-helpful Ruth Paine intuits Oswald acted out in the manner of domestic violence, rebuffed by his estranged wife, he had an epiphany, the Conquering Hero, "I'll kill the president; that will win her heart." But alas, I believe the Warren Commission said motive didn't matter. Besides, Oswald shot at Walker and killed Tippit, therefore killed Kennedy. Oswald killed Kennedy and shot at Walker, so he killed Tippit. Oswald killed Tippit because he killed Kennedy--because he shot at Walker. When did he decide to shoot at Walker? Oswald was created on the armature of need, from sheets of legend dipped in a solution of one part disinformation to two parts commietol. Painted with lurid phrases from Phillips' notebook ("assassin's lair") and highlighted with staged emotional outbursts, a leafleting scuffle, a consulate tantrum. The rhetorical question remains for the playwrights of the coup to supply but we are left with crickets, and popcorn crunching beneath our shoes as we exit. ![[Image: 51brqo.jpg]](http://i39.tinypic.com/51brqo.jpg)
29-06-2010, 10:29 PM
David Williams Wrote:It was DA Henry Wade who made that statement William, it can be seen in Mark Lanes Rush to Judgement film. Thanks David, I was wondering who that was. BK 
30-06-2010, 07:28 AM
What do the lone nutters say? About Oswald's planning or not? Since they can't refer to the WC.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her. “I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
13-07-2010, 06:11 AM
Most Lone Nutters either say that it can't ever be determined when Oswald decided to kill JFK, but some narrow it down to after the official announcement of the motorcade route but before Thursday afternoon when he took the wrapping paper to wrap the gun in to bring the work the following morning.
And the motive is in response to being rejected by his wife and taking the opportunity that was presented to him. It's just that not every guy who is dissed by his wife and has the opportunity to kill the President does so. What does Posner and Bugliosi say, or do I have to go back and regurgiated that myself. BK
13-07-2010, 07:39 AM
Posner might offer a motive, but would first have to copy and paste it from another writer.
Bugliosi would likely wait for Horne to comment on the subject, then launch into an apoplectic ad hominem. What is Dunkel's motive for denying truth? Or Ruth Paine's for framing Oswald? Or Dulles' for claiming "that little Kennedy. . .thought he was a god"? Oswald, obedient to a series of intelligence handlers, caused no actual harm to the 35th president, hence requires no motive. Arlen Specter will launch into a convoluted explanation soon, interrupted by St. Peter pulling the lever on the trap.
13-07-2010, 07:51 AM
Phil Dragoo Wrote:Posner might offer a motive, but would first have to copy and paste it from another writer.:hahaha::hahaha::hahaha:
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her. “I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation. 
13-07-2010, 06:35 PM
Phil Dragoo Wrote:Posner might offer a motive, but would first have to copy and paste it from another writer. I am not ever going to get Bugliosi's book, but Robert Marrow has it so maybe he can give that answer. Dunkel was never sincere, imho. I just don't believe he went from truth to lie. Mack a/k/a Dunkel needed some street cred to land him the sell out job on the 6th floor. Ruth Paine's CIA background was well suited to frame Harvey. Dulles was jealous. And pissed at being fired. So he he in essence became the "god" via revenge. Harvey shot no one. I am still waiting for Arlen to get indicted. Or at least give an interview. If he really want to meet St Peter he'd better come clean. But I am not holding my breath. I'm waiting on Chuck Colson too. Walk the walk, Chuckie. Dawn
13-07-2010, 09:04 PM
Colson makes a public display of Christian behavior, but I skeptically inquire what would Jesus do when revelation of knowledge of evil were at hand.
Regarding the rhetorical question what motives might be ascribed to Lee Harvey Oswald, I scowl at Ruth Paine's obsequious service to the killers by serially framing an innocent man with fantasy marital explanations, stage-prop guns and cameras and photos, etc. Lee Oswald was a patriotic individual performing assigned tasks, realizing too late his role was to become the Color Catcher in the intelligence establishment's dirty laundry. The truth will ultimately rule due to meticulous research such as http://www.jfklancer.com/backes/newman/newman_1.html
11-08-2010, 07:41 AM
That would be a great question to ask my "buddy" Gary Mack! Thank you for the ammunition!
Randy |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)