Thoughts on a bus trip

[Alan Ford]

You are an excellent researcher, Mr. Joseph, absolutely admire and appreciate your keen insights.

In respect to the whole bus/cab scenario, I personally don't believe the wrongfully accused was anywhere near a bus or cab that afternoon, in spite of officialdom putting words into a deadman's mouth to the contrary.

I once set out many moons ago to research the phantom bus and cab rides, but upon reading the following Warren Commission testimony from Mrs. Bledsoe, who swore up and down she saw the wrongfully accused on her bus, I caught her in a lie that suggests she is also lying about the phantom bus encounter as well. One lie needs another lie....Here's her outright lie as she describes an early encounter with Oswald on October 7, 1963 when she was showing him a room she had for rent (please note this encounter takes place weeks before the birth of his 2nd infant child, Rachel, later that month ---->

Mr. JENNER - He told you at that time and informed you that he was unemployed?
Mrs. BLEDSOE - Yes.
Mr. JENNER - And he would be seeking work?
Mrs. BLEDSOE - Yes.
Mr. JENNER - And he said that he was going to bring his wife?
Mrs. BLEDSOE - Yes.
Mr. JENNER - And--when and if he obtained employment?
Mrs. BLEDSOE - And so, that give me a lead, something to talk about, and I said, "Well, what kind of work do you do? "Oh, I do electronics," he said, and I said, "Well, there is some good jobs because you are young, and you can get a good job a young man like you."
And then went on. Then something about him being in the Marines, and I said, "Well, that is wonderful. My son was in the Navy." And talking about him, you know, just getting to know him, and--but, "here is a picture of my wife, and picture of the girl, and the baby." And I said, "Oh, she has got a baby, hasn't she?" And he said, "Yes."

Uh oh......

Good catch, BTW.

Appreciate the acknowledgement, Mr. Prudhomme, dips hat.

I'm fairly new at this (2yrs in May, 2016), but having seen you, Mr. Mitcham and a great many other sharp researchers pay attention to the details on more than a few occasions yourselves during that stretch prompts me to follow the good example already set.

One dynamic runs through this case, no matter what area of evidence is being studied, none of the hasty, contrived "evidence" can ever stand alone against the wrongfully accused (officialdom always seems to need a do over here, there and everywhere to modify this or that). One lie breeds another lie...