13-01-2016, 08:52 PM
Just making your case even stronger I see, Mr. Joseph.
Officialdom would have the public believe the wrongfully accused not only tossed one coat away that day...but now two?!
They said he discarded a tan/white one near 10th and Patton (right!).
Mrs. Roberts saw him void of a Blue coat, soooo, Where on earth did the Blue coat disappear to? It didn't disappear. The wrongfully accused simply never wore a Blue coat. It's rightful owner, someone much taller and heavier than the wrongfully accused--given Mr. McWatter's testimony, simply wore it.
This person--Blue coat man-- could have been an unwitting participate in a much more elaborate scheme, simply charged with boarding the bus in question, securing a bus transfer and then returning it to a party(ies) unknown, without even realizing the full significance of his adventure (we use to do a lot of this many moons ago, sending parties out to perform a specific segment of an assignment, compartmentalized in essence from the larger picture. For instance, on the surface, we'll say something like the City doesn't trust Employee A down in the Treasurer's Office, so take this amount in cash down to his/her office to pay off this or that. The larger picture, unbeknownst to the assignee, is the bills are marked for later identification by the Treasurer's immediate supervisor, who produced the bills in the first place. It's not frivolous to imagine someone could have been fed the same albeit bogus claim about McWatters, without even knowing the full implications of his activities that day).
Of course, Blue coat man could also have been an active participate in the framing of the wrongfully accused, with a limited/minor role, yet significant enough to help build a bogus case against him.
Mr. McWatter's sworn testimony--as shared by Mr. Joseph--demonstrates someone in a blue coat, much taller and heavier than the wrongfully accused was on his bus, who sought and secured a bus transfer that afternoon.
Officialdom would have the public believe the wrongfully accused not only tossed one coat away that day...but now two?!
They said he discarded a tan/white one near 10th and Patton (right!).
Mrs. Roberts saw him void of a Blue coat, soooo, Where on earth did the Blue coat disappear to? It didn't disappear. The wrongfully accused simply never wore a Blue coat. It's rightful owner, someone much taller and heavier than the wrongfully accused--given Mr. McWatter's testimony, simply wore it.
This person--Blue coat man-- could have been an unwitting participate in a much more elaborate scheme, simply charged with boarding the bus in question, securing a bus transfer and then returning it to a party(ies) unknown, without even realizing the full significance of his adventure (we use to do a lot of this many moons ago, sending parties out to perform a specific segment of an assignment, compartmentalized in essence from the larger picture. For instance, on the surface, we'll say something like the City doesn't trust Employee A down in the Treasurer's Office, so take this amount in cash down to his/her office to pay off this or that. The larger picture, unbeknownst to the assignee, is the bills are marked for later identification by the Treasurer's immediate supervisor, who produced the bills in the first place. It's not frivolous to imagine someone could have been fed the same albeit bogus claim about McWatters, without even knowing the full implications of his activities that day).
Of course, Blue coat man could also have been an active participate in the framing of the wrongfully accused, with a limited/minor role, yet significant enough to help build a bogus case against him.
Mr. McWatter's sworn testimony--as shared by Mr. Joseph--demonstrates someone in a blue coat, much taller and heavier than the wrongfully accused was on his bus, who sought and secured a bus transfer that afternoon.