13-01-2016, 11:37 PM
Drew Phipps Wrote:I have a question for Alan: Why is putting Oswald on a bus for a couple of minutes, when he doesn't go anywhere, a prerequisite to proving that Oswald shot Tippet? Conversely, how does proving Oswald didn't get on the bus make him innocent of Tippet's murder?
Putting him on a bus helps the contrived evidence a couple of ways:
A: It associates him in a negative light as he hastily attempts to flee the scene of the crime by any means necessary (as if he has done anything)
B: Once they realized their timeline wouldn't fit in their contrived events at 10th and Patton due to a stalled bus downtown amid a chaotic scene creating gridlock conditions, they quickly tossed the phantom bus ride aside in its full entirety, quickly added a cab to enhance their timeline, which turned out as bogus as their initial phantom ride on the bus. Two coats, two cab scenarios, etc. Is there ever any evidence against the wrongfully accused that doesn't need modification here, there and everywhere?
On to your next question, "Conversely, how does proving Oswald didn't get on the bus make him innocent of Tippet's murder?"
Because if they lied about that, what else are they capable of lying about?
But let's pretend he did get over to that vicinity of town by other means, even if by a magical bullet, a magical bus transfer, Mr. Scott, etc., and pose these questions:
*What happened to the Blue coat (their lie, so they need to explain its absence when Mrs. Roberts saw him)?
*He's not capable of being in two places at once, so while he is already in the Texas Theatre seeking out a contact, who are the two gunman at the same time ambushing Officer Tippitt?
*Why weren't the observations of Mr. Frank Wright allowed into the public record? (We know why, because it doesn't enhance their idea of truth)
*Why was the wrongfully accused absent of blood splatter on his face, hands, hair, clothing, etc., given their fairytale about unloading four rounds into someone else at close range, one discharge in particular given Dr. Earl Rose's autopsy report?
It's these kind of questions that they cannot answer, because it doesn't fit their hastily contrived script. It's that simple really.