24-09-2009, 04:07 PM
"Debating" what, exactly?
When we "debate" anyone on the conspiracy/no conspiracy "controversy," we play into the killers' hands. We help to preserve them and protect them. We do their bidding.
With all due respect: Unless Jim DiEugenio in his opening statement declares that A) conspiracy in the death of JFK is established fact, B) anyone with reasonable access to the supporting evidence who does not so conclude is cognitively impaired and/or complicit in the crime, and C) his intention is to expose McAdam as an accessory after the fact to first degree murder, this exercise will do enormous harm to the cause.
Again: All that McAdams's masters desire is to prolong the illusion of a level playing field for their lies and our truth.
This "debate" likely will aid and abet the killers of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
When we "debate" anyone on the conspiracy/no conspiracy "controversy," we play into the killers' hands. We help to preserve them and protect them. We do their bidding.
With all due respect: Unless Jim DiEugenio in his opening statement declares that A) conspiracy in the death of JFK is established fact, B) anyone with reasonable access to the supporting evidence who does not so conclude is cognitively impaired and/or complicit in the crime, and C) his intention is to expose McAdam as an accessory after the fact to first degree murder, this exercise will do enormous harm to the cause.
Again: All that McAdams's masters desire is to prolong the illusion of a level playing field for their lies and our truth.
This "debate" likely will aid and abet the killers of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene

