Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams
#11
Yes JIMWill have itarchived on his site tomorrow or by 48 hours I BELIEVE asA RULE..I QUOTE a reply set to me,These gentleman are like ships that pass in the night. It’s a nice encapsulation of the problems involved in wading through the morasse of available info. IT DOES pointOUT IMO JUST HOW MUc HAS BEEN DISTORED MANIPULATEDAND changed i was surprised that john mcadams did not know about the three paper bags..........the impression is often that many LNRSperhaps came to an end with the w/cand do notread thelatest thoughvon pein is all over the web the man does nothing else im.......it is amazing to listen to jim he has an encylopedic mind he is a fountain as it pours out..I heard LEN SAY they will complete the interview nxt week for a couple of hours as it got too late thisevening as there was further quesions on the agenda..john M ONLY MADE TWO THAT i heard crummy remarks one aimed at jack and his work of course.it was ok jackthair wasblue here I GOT HIM good JOHN SHOWED HIS SMALL MINDEDNESS AND ALSO AT DRDAVi \LIVINSTON HE IS THE BEST MOST QUALIFIED WITHIN ALL OF THIS ON EITHER SIDE,HE HAS beenTO THE ARCHIVES 9 TIMES RE THE AUTOPSY MEDICAL RECORDS ETC. TO EXAMINE AND STUDY ALL.....HIS WORK IS WITHIN DR.JIM FETZER'S BOOk.FOR A BIT MCADAMSWAS MAKING OUT LIKE HE KNEW MORE THAN THE DR..I GOT A CHUCKLE OUT OF THAT BLOOPER as well as more about photography than jack....ha.I IM,AGINW THEY WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO GO BY , BY DR.JIM...I CERTainly wouldnot be surprised at a rply to those commentsfrom dr.jim...
sorry my typing is so eratic this lap sucks as well as my hands and arms , they suck also..so there more hum bug..B..
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by John Geraghty - 24-09-2009, 12:57 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Magda Hassan - 24-09-2009, 01:11 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Charles Drago - 24-09-2009, 04:07 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 24-09-2009, 09:09 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 24-09-2009, 10:01 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 24-09-2009, 10:16 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Myra Bronstein - 25-09-2009, 05:55 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 25-09-2009, 07:29 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Myra Bronstein - 25-09-2009, 07:48 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 25-09-2009, 08:19 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 25-09-2009, 08:19 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 26-09-2009, 04:05 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 26-09-2009, 04:11 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 26-09-2009, 07:45 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 26-09-2009, 10:39 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 27-09-2009, 06:33 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Charles Drago - 27-09-2009, 01:45 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 27-09-2009, 08:42 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 27-09-2009, 08:49 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 27-09-2009, 09:11 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 27-09-2009, 09:40 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 28-09-2009, 06:34 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 28-09-2009, 06:55 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 28-09-2009, 07:04 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 28-09-2009, 07:20 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by John Kelin - 28-09-2009, 03:50 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 29-09-2009, 06:33 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Gil Jesus - 30-09-2009, 02:50 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 30-09-2009, 06:21 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Jack White - 30-09-2009, 07:45 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 30-09-2009, 10:50 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 30-09-2009, 10:59 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Gil Jesus - 30-09-2009, 11:22 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 30-09-2009, 11:25 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Gil Jesus - 30-09-2009, 11:27 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Charles Drago - 01-10-2009, 12:00 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 01-10-2009, 12:05 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 26-09-2009, 07:34 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Jim DiEugenio: Not to be Trusted Richard Gilbride 24 3,054 27-12-2024, 06:08 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio On "The Loser's Club" Brian Doyle 0 453 30-12-2023, 07:06 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Reviews Kamp's Book But Doesn't Mention Prayer Man Brian Doyle 0 600 06-10-2023, 02:54 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim DiEugenio Betrays Deep Politics Forum Over Prayer Man Brian Doyle 4 1,100 05-10-2023, 05:11 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Gives Reference To ROKC Troll Farm And Kamp Brian Doyle 0 594 09-08-2023, 03:02 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research Brian Doyle 1 776 07-07-2023, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim DiEugenio Reviews The House of Kennedy Jim DiEugenio 0 2,409 26-04-2020, 06:50 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  James DiEugenio, I have a single question, would you answer? Scott Kaiser 12 7,953 11-06-2019, 04:32 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Denial of Justice reviewed by Jim DiEugenio Jim DiEugenio 4 4,196 23-05-2019, 10:35 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Jim DiEugenio Critiques CNN's American Dynasties Jim DiEugenio 0 14,087 20-07-2018, 09:40 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)