Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams

[Bernice Moore]

http://www.blackopradio.com/archives2009.html

I was wrong. It was a TKO in the first round! Oh, well.....in a way, it is almost sad to....no pathetic...to see someone try to defend the official version of the magic show in Dallas on 11/22/63 - complete with disappearing acts; diversions of attention of the audience's focus; hidden devices to pull off the performance; stage props; backstage accomplices; hawkers; shills; et al....they even had thieves pickpocketing the National audience of their democracy during and after the 'performance'.

Is it just me, or is the link not working to part II?

Hi Peter part 11 will not be taped till yjis coming thurs....we must await..:help:

I would try to sum it up now perhaps as, “Your witnesses are crap, but mine are good.” John purports that LHO was simply a ne’er do well who shot the prez for some unknown reason. No need to look for subtleties, no need to look for double meanings, no need to look for alternative explanations – it’s all perfectly simple. he was the lone assassin cause the gov said so..... ALL the autopsy problems can be explained by the incompetence of the prosectors, for example.

The fact is, there is so much crap out there that John’s stance has its merits.by comparison... My God, look at what we have had on the CT side of the fence: Judyth Baker,Jimmy Files, Dan Marvin,Roscoe White, and Uncle Tom Cobley and all… innovating away some of the miseries further .....more so as if all was not seriously.. We, as conspiracy theorists, have a much tougher job than McAdams, in having to separate the shite from the filet mignon. thanks B:vroam: