23-06-2010, 03:05 AM
(This post was last modified: 23-06-2010, 03:09 AM by James H. Fetzer.)
Dawn,
I see that I did not actually answer your question, for which I apologize. At the very least, whatever hit the North Tower did not look remotely like a 767. Video fakery appears to have been used for the South Tower hit. A 757 flew toward the Pentagon, but swerved over it and did not hit it. And the 757 in Shanksville did not crash there but may have been shot down or landed in Cleveland! I know that sounds very odd, but, as I explain in my Powerpoint presentations, that is what the evidence supports--although there is also a lot of evidence (including no proof the hijackers were even on board the planes, that the phone calls turn out to have been faked, that no investigation of any of the crashes were ever conducted, that none of the 1.5 million of uniquely identifiable parts of the planes have been produced by the government, and that FAA Registration data, which I have in hand, show that the planes corresponding to Flights 11 and 77 were not de-registered until 2002 and corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 not until 2005) that suggests the situation may be even more drastic than that. I gave you links that substantiate many of these points, but I did not appreciate that you were engaged in a trial and did not have time for any of this. I am terribly sorry about that and wish I had been more directly responsive to your query. I hope that you were not distracted.
Jim
I see that I did not actually answer your question, for which I apologize. At the very least, whatever hit the North Tower did not look remotely like a 767. Video fakery appears to have been used for the South Tower hit. A 757 flew toward the Pentagon, but swerved over it and did not hit it. And the 757 in Shanksville did not crash there but may have been shot down or landed in Cleveland! I know that sounds very odd, but, as I explain in my Powerpoint presentations, that is what the evidence supports--although there is also a lot of evidence (including no proof the hijackers were even on board the planes, that the phone calls turn out to have been faked, that no investigation of any of the crashes were ever conducted, that none of the 1.5 million of uniquely identifiable parts of the planes have been produced by the government, and that FAA Registration data, which I have in hand, show that the planes corresponding to Flights 11 and 77 were not de-registered until 2002 and corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 not until 2005) that suggests the situation may be even more drastic than that. I gave you links that substantiate many of these points, but I did not appreciate that you were engaged in a trial and did not have time for any of this. I am terribly sorry about that and wish I had been more directly responsive to your query. I hope that you were not distracted.
Jim
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Jim:
Before I became overly busy with work I was following the l-o-n- g thread at the other forum and saw Lifton's many attacks on you and Judyth. (I have long ceased to be registered there so could not respond) .
I have just two questions re the above: What about Jim DiEugenio's article did Lifton attack? (In brief)
And on 9-11. Clearly a false flag, inside job and I suspect Zionists had a hand, but recently someone told me that one of the things you believe about 9-11 is that there wer no planes at all. Not that the planes were remotely controlled but that there were none. Is this your belief? Please do not direct me to numerous web sites as I am in the mids of preparing for three trials, two this month so have not time to research this, just ask the question.
Thanks,
Dawn
ps Good luck in getting back your grand.
