Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Lifton attacks Fetzer over 9/11 and Israeli Complicity
#29
Dawn Meredith Wrote:
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Good points, Jack. Unfortunately, I came on Black Op
Radio after John Judge had just presented this absurd
story about his friend, the stewardess, and made some
highly unflattering remarks about him. Anyone wanting
more about the Pentagon might want to check this out:

"What Didn't Happen at the Pentagon"
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010...-pentagon.html

The "absurd" story is from well known MLK researcher Tamera Carter (aka T Carter). That you would badmouth John Judge - who is and has been COPA for so long tells me more than I need to know. Or perhaps exactly what I needed to know.

And just why is it that you and Steven Jones are no longer speaking? (Never mind, it is a rhetorical question)

Dawn
ps I don't tell you how to teach philosophy so do not tell me how to practice law. FWIW I am in the process of trying to find witnesses who were in NY. But I work full time at law so don't have the time of a - (possibly-) retired philosophy prof who was utterly unable to answer a question but instead directed me to web sites. I am open to the truth. Period. People may well have been fooled into thinking they saw something, that did not happen. I think certainly T could have been fooled as I have looked at Jack's stuff re the Pentagon.
But to badmouth John Judge on air is very telling of your arrogance. So frankly this discussion is, for me, over.

Dawn, despite Jim's hair-trigger heavy-handedness, he is correct on
everything he has said re 911, Steven Jones, and John Judge.

Jim possibly is the MOST informed of all 911 researchers. Steven Jones
closed his mind when he discovered nano-thermite and rests on his
pride of authorship. John Judge (and T.Carter) were fooled by a very
odd bit of propagandaship. Defending these people when they are
wrong demonstrates a lack of understand of the evidence.

Jack
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Lifton attacks Fetzer over 9/11 and Israeli Complicity - by Mark Stapleton - 07-06-2010, 02:47 PM
Lifton attacks Fetzer over 9/11 and Israeli Complicity - by Jack White - 23-06-2010, 03:50 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DPF Bans Professor James H. Fetzer: The Rationale The Moderators 69 362,168 04-04-2020, 09:01 AM
Last Post: Mark A. O'Blazney
  The Mellon Foundation attacks Jim Garrison Anthony Thorne 4 14,023 14-09-2018, 02:11 AM
Last Post: James Lateer
  Clay Shaw’s “Centro Mondiale Commerciale” and its Israeli connections Paz Marverde 43 41,749 15-05-2018, 07:26 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Clay Shaw’s Centro Mondiale Commerciale and its Israeli connections Paz Marverde 1 10,595 03-12-2017, 07:03 PM
Last Post: Paz Marverde
  Epstein attacks Stone and Snowden in credulous Hwd Reporter article Joseph McBride 7 4,388 20-09-2016, 04:40 PM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Has Lifton Cracked The Case? Albert Doyle 35 23,031 03-04-2016, 08:49 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  The Decline and Fall of Jim Fetzer Jim DiEugenio 132 66,838 18-03-2016, 06:51 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  Are H&L website attacks Voodoo Research? Jim Hargrove 0 2,123 26-03-2014, 10:52 PM
Last Post: Jim Hargrove
  From James Fetzer's Group - for those interested Adele Edisen 5 3,407 08-06-2013, 12:47 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  Fetzer gets a listing in Urban Dictionary: 'Fetzering' is a term for talking balls. Seamus Coogan 83 19,548 26-03-2013, 11:24 PM
Last Post: John Mooney

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)