07-03-2016, 05:41 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-03-2016, 06:57 AM by Jim DiEugenio.)
Anyone can read Caufield pgs. 75-90 and make up their own mind.
But its hard to avoid this on page 90:
"Credible evidence presented herein suggests Lee Harvey Oswald was tied to at least one leader of the American Nazi party, Ray Leahart, if not a second, Dan Burros. The allegations are not unexpected, since Oswald came from a racist and anti-Semitic household and had a close ties to to Nazi Oriented individuals, Guy Banister and David Ferrie."
The first sentence, as I showed in my review is simply false. The second sentence is a bit ridiculous. It is all over the top and irresponsible hyperbole in order to paint Oswald as something he was not.
But its surprising you don't detect what the author is aiming at, because I fail to see the allusion there.
But its hard to avoid this on page 90:
"Credible evidence presented herein suggests Lee Harvey Oswald was tied to at least one leader of the American Nazi party, Ray Leahart, if not a second, Dan Burros. The allegations are not unexpected, since Oswald came from a racist and anti-Semitic household and had a close ties to to Nazi Oriented individuals, Guy Banister and David Ferrie."
The first sentence, as I showed in my review is simply false. The second sentence is a bit ridiculous. It is all over the top and irresponsible hyperbole in order to paint Oswald as something he was not.
But its surprising you don't detect what the author is aiming at, because I fail to see the allusion there.