17-02-2011, 03:09 AM
Same old Trowbridge. As I can see from your silly article.
The information in Probe was from Eddie Tatro. And also from Jim Marrs.
Your beef is with them, especially Jim Marrs.
Because when I called him on this issue, know what he did?
He went back to his files, and retrieved his notebooks on this. He had the notes from the interview he did with you to back up what he said you said. Sorry, but that is the way journalism is done. If you have the written back up, you have it.
You can argue with Jim and say he made it up after or something. But 1.) Jim Marrs does not seem to me to be that kind of guy. I mean I know him fairly well. 2.) Why would he do that anyway?
But either way, you should be talking to and about him, not me. He should not be a problem to get in contact with. He has a web site.
The information in Probe was from Eddie Tatro. And also from Jim Marrs.
Your beef is with them, especially Jim Marrs.
Because when I called him on this issue, know what he did?
He went back to his files, and retrieved his notebooks on this. He had the notes from the interview he did with you to back up what he said you said. Sorry, but that is the way journalism is done. If you have the written back up, you have it.
You can argue with Jim and say he made it up after or something. But 1.) Jim Marrs does not seem to me to be that kind of guy. I mean I know him fairly well. 2.) Why would he do that anyway?
But either way, you should be talking to and about him, not me. He should not be a problem to get in contact with. He has a web site.