Lifton on DiEugenio on JFK offering the Vice Presidential nomination to LBJ . . .

[James H. Fetzer]

Here's a sampler of the kind of information that Jim DiEugenio, who thinks he is the greatest thing in JFK research since Mark Lane, appears to be utterly incapable of processing intellectually. I'll put it this way: this guy is just as authentic as the film!

ON THE FAKING OF THE ZAPRUDER FILM:

"New Proof of JFK Film Fakery"
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_...fk_fil.htm

"Mary in the Street - Revisited"
http://www.jfkresearch.com/Moorman/

"Zapruder JFK Film impeached by Moorman JFK Polaroid"
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Zaprude...24-48.html

MORE RECENT WORK ON FILM FAKERY:

"US Government Official: JFK Cover-Up, Film Fabrication"
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/...5772.shtml

"The JFK 'Head Shot' Paradox"
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/fetzer1.1.1.html

"Who's telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film?"
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/01/...ll-or.html

Plus John Costella has a nice tutorial into to Z-film fakery:

"THE JFK ASSASSINATION FILM HOAX: AN INTRODUCTION"
http://assassinationscience.com/johncostella/jfk/intro/

and there is a 66-part series about the Duluth conference I organized under
the title, "Zapruder Fakery", http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zSghy2TkIY

Yes Martin, there are people who still do take BE seriously.

Even today.

For example Jim (everything in this case is fake, including Dealey Plaza) Fetzer, and Ray (Jim Garrison thought Oswald did it) Carroll.

This, even after the work of people like Gary Aguilar, David Mantik, and William Law and Bob Groden on the subject. (BTW, the Law book is a good book. I understand it is being updated.)