The State of the Case: by Jim DiEugenio

[Jim DiEugenio]

That section is one of my favorite parts of the book actually.

Because it goes right to the heart of the matter with the medical evidence.

[Marc Ellis]

That section is one of my favorite parts of the book actually.


Because it goes right to the heart of the matter with the medical evidence.

'Reclaiming Parkland' is an important book. If the Bug's massive tome is 'for the ages' as they say, any competent scholar must by necessity compare it to JDE's 'Reclaiming Parkland'. It is important because it's the best and most thorough rebuttal of Bugliosi out there. In fact,it may be the only book out there focused on refuting the Bug's conclusions.

There was some Tom Hanks and Hollywood silliness the reader had to wade through at the beginning. But it didn't last long. And when JDE starts in on Bugs, I think it's his best work yet. Thorough, logical and persuasive.

[Jim DiEugenio]

Marc:

I don't think you have read the expurgated parts.

Go to Feral House, "The Assassinations" and scroll down.

There was about 55 pages cut out. Its all good.

[Marc Ellis]

Marc:

I don't think you have read the expurgated parts.

Go to Feral House, "The Assassinations" and scroll down.

There was about 55 pages cut out. Its all good.

I will.

I read the Feral House section linked at the CTKA review - here:

http://feralhouse.com/wp/wp-content/uplo...rkland.pdf

40 pages. I didn't know there was more.

I've read three books on the assassination thus far. Two by JDE and one by Summers. Don't know what I'll read next. But I do know what book I'll check first if I need to run down an assertion by Bugs, McAdams or other coincidence theorists.

BTW, in real life, I don't know anybody who believes the official story.