Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nix Film
#21
Peter Lemkin Wrote:The man in black certainly vanishes; then the woman in tan suddenly appears.

Peter, that's because we're watching a loop of the same segment of the film. The tan woman is at the beginning, and the man in black is at the end. Then it stops and instantly starts over again.
Reply
#22
It does look like the Connallys, Greer and Kellerman are all lurching forward suddenly, which is consistent with the car briefly stopping.
The back-and-to-the-left movement of JFK is really visible here.
Reply
#23
So, any comments from anyone about the Mary Ann Moorman interview?
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.

Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Reply
#24
Tracy Riddle Wrote:It does look like the Connallys, Greer and Kellerman are all lurching forward suddenly, which is consistent with the car briefly stopping.
The back-and-to-the-left movement of JFK is really visible here.

Odd that Jackie and JFK are not lurching forward at the same time as the other four occupants of the limo, wouldn't you say? Especially if one considers that JFK is virtually comatose at this point, and Jackie appears to be perched on the edge of her seat.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.

Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Reply
#25
Quote:Odd that Jackie and JFK are not lurching forward at the same time as the other four occupants of the limo, wouldn't you say? Especially if one considers that JFK is virtually comatose at this point, and Jackie appears to be perched on the edge of her seat.

Even if, for example, Jackie had a foot braced hard against the seat in front, her upper body would have lurched forward. I say Kellerman made a "business decision" and ducked.
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I

"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
Reply
#26
Lauren Johnson Wrote:
Quote:Odd that Jackie and JFK are not lurching forward at the same time as the other four occupants of the limo, wouldn't you say? Especially if one considers that JFK is virtually comatose at this point, and Jackie appears to be perched on the edge of her seat.

Even if, for example, Jackie had a foot braced hard against the seat in front, her upper body would have lurched forward. I say Kellerman made a "business decision" and ducked.

If you watch one of the enhanced versions of the Zapruder film, you will see that Kellerman and Greer rebound from "ducking" almost as fast as they "duck". Does this seem normal? If you felt you were under fire and ducked, would you not stay down for at least a few seconds, or until you felt it was safe to come back up?
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.

Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Reply
#27
I personally think that Mary M, bless her heart, is just wrong about the order and sequence of the shots, and the movement of the limo? If I recall she also said something about hearing conversation from the car, which I suspect is much her own thoughts as anything she heard, inasmuch as the car moved off pretty fast afterwards. Her story does have the benefit of being fairly consistent for 50 years.


Regional note: In the south part of the US, you can say anything bad about any female, so long as you include the phrase, "bless her heart," and get away with it.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply
#28
Drew, have you or any of the others read James Altgens' testimony to the WC? There are things in there which would go a long ways to support Mary Ann Moorman's recollection of the shot sequence and timing.

Just because a witness's recollection of events contradicts the official story does not mean they are automatically:

a) Mistaken
b) Confused
c) Lying
d) Seeking fifteen minutes of fame
e) Seeking to get rich quick
f) "Mis-remembering" (my personal favourite)
g) Not professionally qualified to make an observation or understand what was observed
h) All of the above
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.

Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Reply
#29
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Drew, have you or any of the others read James Altgens' testimony to the WC? There are things in there which would go a long ways to support Mary Ann Moorman's recollection of the shot sequence and timing.

Just because a witness's recollection of events contradicts the official story does not mean they are automatically:

a) Mistaken
b) Confused
c) Lying
d) Seeking fifteen minutes of fame
e) Seeking to get rich quick
f) "Mis-remembering" (my personal favourite)
g) Not professionally qualified to make an observation or understand what was observed
h) All of the above

Another possibility is the use of silencers and other means to influence the perception of the shots fired.

Bob, would you mind terribly putting up a link to your favored enhanced version of the Z film so we're on the same page?
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I

"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
Reply
#30
I'm not suggesting that contradicting the "official" story means anything at all about a person. Based on what I've read, seen, heard, and studied for the last 50 years (not full time), and logic and common sense, I come to a different answer than Mary Moorman.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DARNELL film Original Richard Gilbride 3 115 20-09-2024, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Sarah Stanton (i.e. PrayerMan) in Dan Owens film Richard Gilbride 7 2,036 01-10-2023, 03:25 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Manipulation of TOWNER film David Josephs 0 2,241 26-11-2019, 06:48 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  Did Dillard film American-born LEE Oswald on sixth floor? Jim Hargrove 9 9,377 12-04-2017, 05:02 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  New JFK Film Peter Lemkin 4 5,896 12-11-2016, 06:16 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  How much could you alter the film if Abraham Zapruder had shot in slow motion mode? Chris Bennett 27 14,247 23-02-2016, 05:46 PM
Last Post: Chris Davidson
  The "Other" Zapruder Film Gil Jesus 43 47,548 14-01-2016, 01:29 AM
Last Post: David Josephs
  Lawsuit to return original of Nix film. Jim Hargrove 0 2,578 24-11-2015, 05:02 PM
Last Post: Jim Hargrove
  New film: LBJ Martin White 19 9,440 14-11-2015, 05:40 PM
Last Post: Alan Ford
  "The Package" -- The Most Important JFK Assassination-Related Film to Date Charles Drago 31 26,003 07-07-2015, 08:52 PM
Last Post: R.K. Locke

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)