14-02-2011, 03:01 PM
James H. Fetzer Wrote:the problem lies within you, Charles, in your stubborn refusal to acknowledge the central figure in the death of our 35th president, who had more to gain personally than anyone else in the world. Lyndon was the pivotal player without whom it would not have occurred.
Again in the spirit of respectful detente, I offer not criticism but only praise.
I cannot speak for anyone but myself, but I am humbled by the sheer volume of Jim's analyses of this case. Proof?
1. He has studied every person alive in the entire world at the time of JFK's death in order to determine that it was LBJ who had more to gain than any of them by the president's elimination.
2. He has studied every possible assassination scenario and determined that there was one way ONLY to kill JFK.
I stand in awe of such labor and logic.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene