Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 2.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim DiEugenio: Not to be Trusted
#21
DiEugenio posts as if he is morally indignant that Pompeo forced Trump and Carlson to shut down the truth on the Kennedy Assassination...Jim phrases his writing as if he himself would be forth-coming on any truthful information according to his own personal beliefs and code of conduct...

Jim doesn't realize that he himself is acting as the Pompeo who shuts down the truth in regard to my posting of the Prayer Man evidence on the Education Forum...Jim has joined up with Gordon and praised him for censoring my correct evidence...The man is a massive hypocrite who has no problem taking the role of Pompeo and then turning around and criticizing it when others do it...
Reply
#22
DiEugenio lauds Jeffery Sachs as being an academic with spine...Which suggests that Jim himself practices such brave dedication to the truth...

DiEugenio's own credibility in the spine department is purely the product of wordsmithing like his post at the Education Forum lauding Sachs...Jim has backbone in words only...If Jim really had the backbone he recognizes in others he would come in to these threads and answer for his treatment of the Prayer Man issue, which is a little less than brave...

If Jim had the backbone he cites in others he would come here and explain why he never recognized my Prayer Man evidence that proved Sarah Stanton was Prayer Man...Or why he accused me of trolling him when I tried to get him to get Stone to obtain the original films...Instead of asking Stone to get the original Wiegman and Darnell scans Jim lied and told the members of the Education Forum that Stone's producer had told me it was not possible to get the films...That isn't true and Robert Wilson actually said he was familiar with the process and all he needed was the word from Stone...Jim then praised James Gordon for banning me saying that I was only trying to troll him and that it was the right thing to do...That was before Gordon recused himself from the moderation because of stealing nearly a year's worth of member's dues...

No, If Jim DiEugenio had the spine he cites in others he would explain why he ignored my discovery of Sarah Stanton hearing Oswald say he wasn't going out to the front steps but was going back in to the Break Room (2nd Floor Lunch Room) instead...This is one of the most important evidence discoveries in JFK research history that Jim, for reasons only know to himself (probably to do with ego), has chosen to deliberately ignore...Instead we are forced to listen to this wheel-spinning sanctimonious editorializing while Jim himself helps prevent a solving of the case by siding with some of the worst characters in JFK research...
Reply
#23
Jim D is in the Jenkins thread on the Education Forum defending Pat Speer and coming in against Doug Horne...


Unbelievable...


Jim commits this research heresy by ignoring Commander Pitzer who filmed the covert autopsy remotely and was murdered by CIA for it...


Good thing Pitzer has DiEugenio covering his back...
Reply
#24
DiEugenio just posted that the Education Forum practices Free Speech...A bigger lie could not be told and all one has to do is examine how that forum handled the Prayer Man issue...When myself, Gilbride, and Graves tried to post that the evidence was showing that Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton all 3 of us were banned...When the recently discovered image of a female dress neckline on Prayer Man was posted on the Education Forum the biased moderators Sandy Larsen and James Gordon thread-slid the thread and made sure its irrefutable proof was never admitted...DiEugenio is a censorship-protected liar when he claims Free Speech is protected on the Education Forum...This false claim is protected by the tolerance of opposing opinions format on the Forum that opens the door for the worst Lone Nutter trolls...Larsen and Gordon have a pro-Prayer Man bias and will not allow the neckline evidence to be brought to its correct conclusion...Gordon extends his own personal agenda in to the moderation and will not allow his site's favorite pet theory to be refuted...Jim is lying and this is the opposite of Free Speech or sound Peer Review...What a god-damned hypocrite...
Reply
#25
DiEugenio is posting sanctimonious entries on The Education Forum over the unreleased files...The files will never be released...Jim is just wasting our time with more sanctimonious click bait...Trump is a giant lump of orange shit and he will break his word...Jim Protect His Own Cowardly Skin DiEugenio will post these useless anthems until he dies and we will continue to get the same amount of nothing that we have already gotten up to now...DiEugenio is great at posing himself as an instigator of truth but he himself hides behind that royal buffoon Gordon's cowardly censorship and refuses to admit my Prayer Man evidence harder than CIA refuses to release the files...Shameless persons who dare call themselves Conspiracy researchers ignore my incredibly important discoveries more than the Lone Nutters all so they can cuddle up to that stupid bastard Gordon who runs The Education Forum like his own personal venue because he's too stupid to run it academically...
Reply
#26
DiEugenio and Schnapf are over on The Education Forum bragging about their hijacking of the forum under that cowardly ignoramus Gordon...Gordon has kept the bullshit Prayer Man theory alive by means of bullying and banning...Jim and Larry are praising FOX News and Morley's consenting to appear on the right-wing network...However they are not mentioning Morley's rejection of the Prayer Man theory...

DiEugenio is a really dishonest bum...He's one of the most dishonest persons I've ever experienced and he's about to destroy Oliver Stone's credibility...But that's OK because him and Gordon will just ban anyone who points it out...
Reply
#27
Jim D is over on The Education Forum cashing in on the lowest hanging fruit...

Ask Jim to tackle a more difficult subject in the form of the Prayer Man evidence and the.site's handling of it while he has Simkin's attention...
Reply
#28
[size=12]T[/size]HE CIA'S ONGOING COVERUP
WITNESSES TELL JFK ASSASSINATION TASK FORCE
Dick Russell
May 23

 

Two key government witnesses came forward at the recent congressional hearing in Washington of a declassification task force, around still-withheld records related to the murder of President Kennedy more than sixty years ago. If anyone thought it was impossible to be shocked by revelations at this late date, they would’ve been wrong.
The first to testify was Dan Hardway, who’d been in his mid-twenties when he served as an investigator for the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA, 1977-79): “I believe we were very close to some major discoveries,” he said, “and then the CIA ran an illegal domestic covert operation involving an undercover officer to subvert and obstruct the HSCA.”

That undercover officer was a man named George Joannides. His file is probably the most sought-after in the current release effort - and so far the CIA says it cannot locate it. At the time of the assassination in 1963, Joannides was the head of the Agency’s psychological warfare branch at its station in Miami. There he directed a group of anti-Castro Cuban exiles known as the Student Revolutionary Directorate. Members of that group had consorted with Lee Harvey Oswald that summer in New Orleans and, after the assassination, taken the lead in spreading the first (false) “conspiracy theory” - that the accused assassin had committed the act on behalf of Castro’s Cuban regime.
The HSCA was unaware of Joannides’ history. “We were told he had no connection of any kind with any aspect of the Kennedy case,” Hardway recalled. In May 1978 the CIA appointed Joannides as their liaison to aid the committee’s search for important records. As Hardway put it, “the very man who knew exactly how to keep us from finding what we were looking for.” Hardway detailed how Joannides “began slowly tightening down the process,” including placing portions of files in sealed envelopes to which the investigators did not have access for their Final Report.
Hardway and a partner, Ed Lopez, were the HSCA’s sleuths looking into one of the biggest mysteries around the assassination. What was Oswald, and/or someone resembling him, really doing when showing up at the Cuban Consulate and Russian Embassy in Mexico City less than two months before the assassination seeking a travel visa to Cuba?
It turns out that Joannides was working closely with David Atlee Phillips, at the time the overseer of the CIA’s covert operations in Mexico City - and who the HSCA learned had been seen in Oswald’s company in Dallas in early September. Hardway testified that “we can draw reasonable inferences from the evidence that is of record - facts not theories - that clearly point to Oswald being used in an operation in Mexico City….designed to discredit the Fair Play for Cuba Committee” [for which Oswald started a one-man chapter]. Hardway pointed out that this doesn’t necessarily mean the CIA was behind Kennedy’s assassination, but “they obviously had something they were very desperate about hiding,”
He recounted a story about a certain file he really wanted to see, which Joannides presented to him personally at CIA headquarters. It had not only been redacted but retyped, indicating someone may have made more omissions. Hardway says he “exploded and….stormed out of the room.” Subsequently, Hardway saw a memorandum “which says the file was shown to me and, quote, ‘no objections were recorded.’” The CIA “didn’t say that i didn’t make any” which is what was inferred - they just weren’t written down.
The second witness testifying before the Task Force was Judge John Tunheim, who had chaired the Assassination Records Review Board (1994-98). The AARB was created by President Clinton following renewed interest inspired by Oliver Stone’s film JFK. The Board’s task was reviewing still-secret records and declassifying as many as possible. Ultimately, almost five million pages ended up at the National Archives.
But Judge Tunheim didn’t mince words about continued stonewalling by the government, and not only the CIA. “The Secret Service was very difficult, the only agency we were aware of that tried to reclassify assassination records after we were in office. The JFK Records Act specifically required the Department of State to help us find foreign records,” but they proved “less than helpful. When we negotiated with Russian officials over the Oswald files in Moscow [where he had allegedly defected in 1959], they did not lift a finger to help us, not even allowing us access to the United States Embassy [files on the defection]. When we planned meetings with Mexican and Cuban officials, they [State Department] stopped us from direct contact.”
The CIA, not surprisingly, had kept up their masterfully deceitful ways. When the ARRB asked specifically for records of former counterintelligence chief James Angleton, “we were told these were no longer maintained as a collection….[and that] all other documents were destroyed. “ Now, since President Trump’s executive order for release of all remaining files, “we are seeing a flood of documents that clearly meet the definition of assassination records involving Angleton and others that were not submitted to us for review.” Indeed, it’s become clear that Angleton had been monitoring Oswald’s activities continuously for four years before the assassination.
As for George Joannides, he died in 1990 at the age of 67. Tunheim noted: “We had in our hands a small file on Joannides that disclosed nothing….just his personnel file, when he got paid and when he separated. So it was returned. We didn’t know details of his work at the time. Clearly we were misled. I wrote to President Biden [about] asking the CIA to release its Joannides file, and I never received a response.”
U.S. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who chairs the Task Force, said she’d spoken to the CIA Director a week ago, and the Agency then served notice that four out of five requested files considered most important by assassination researchers will be made public within a couple of weeks. These include Oswald’s travel records and CIA “201” file, and a whistleblower report implicating the CIA for its role. However, as mentioned, the Joannides file is still missing-in-action.
“No matter how ugly or inconvenient it is, the American people deserve and can handle the truth,” said U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace. “Approximately two-thirds of Americans don’t buy the official narrative. There is so much distrust that nearly forty percent believe the U.S. Government was involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. The Task Force is looking to use sunshine as a disinfectant, and get people the unvarnished truth.”
Dan Hardway summarized it like this: “My question for the Task Force is whether anyone in the new generation of leaders has the backbone, the courage and the gumption to try to do something even at this late date. It’s easy to admit and air the sins of our ancestors. It’s much harder to admit that we built their tombs and endorsed their action by our inaction. I am here to testify again, which is all that I can do. What will you do?”
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#29
Jim DiEugenio is happily praising the pro Trump "Turning Point" think tank over on The Education Forum...

Jim pretends not to notice that Anna Luna represents the people who killed Kennedy trying to take credit for solving the conspiracy...

Greg Parker nuts like Ed LeDoux are cavorting with DiEugenio as they sabotage the research community with attempts to join the search for the NBC films...

Gordon and Simkin all too happily assist the Prayer Man trolls in hijacking the research community with Jim D's full approval...

Jim stays within the safe protection of Simkin's censorship...
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DiEugenio And Stone Blow Victoria Adams Story Brian Doyle 1 1,451 05-05-2025, 05:14 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Hypocritical Fraud Jim DiEugenio Brian Doyle 4 1,940 29-03-2025, 08:27 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio On "The Loser's Club" Brian Doyle 0 1,379 30-12-2023, 07:06 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Reviews Kamp's Book But Doesn't Mention Prayer Man Brian Doyle 0 1,698 06-10-2023, 02:54 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim DiEugenio Betrays Deep Politics Forum Over Prayer Man Brian Doyle 4 2,954 05-10-2023, 05:11 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Gives Reference To ROKC Troll Farm And Kamp Brian Doyle 0 1,556 09-08-2023, 03:02 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research Brian Doyle 1 2,004 07-07-2023, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim DiEugenio Reviews The House of Kennedy Jim DiEugenio 0 3,552 26-04-2020, 06:50 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  James DiEugenio, I have a single question, would you answer? Scott Kaiser 12 11,233 11-06-2019, 04:32 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Denial of Justice reviewed by Jim DiEugenio Jim DiEugenio 4 5,701 23-05-2019, 10:35 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)